The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00004015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito do tempo de espera para radioterapia na sobrevida geral em cinco anos de mulheres com câncer do colo do útero, 1995-2010

Abstract: Efeito do tempo de espera para radioterapia na sobrevida geral em cinco anos de mulheres com câncer do colo do útero, 1995-2010Effect of waiting time for radiotherapy on five-year overall survival in women with cervical cancer, 1995-2010 Efecto del tiempo de espera para radioterapia en una sobrevida global en 5 años de mujeres con cáncer del cuello uterino,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 . With regard to advanced-stage diagnosis, Nascimento and Silva 36 detected 78.9% of the women studied in the intermediate stages and 5% in the advanced stages of the disease, corroborating with the perspective that more advan-ced ages and social and racial inequalities are correlated with a higher CC risk and prevalence. The limited access to cervical cancer (CC) diagnosis services was related to organizational barriers and limited action by health professionals 33,37,38 .…”
Section: Care Line Milestonesupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…35 . With regard to advanced-stage diagnosis, Nascimento and Silva 36 detected 78.9% of the women studied in the intermediate stages and 5% in the advanced stages of the disease, corroborating with the perspective that more advan-ced ages and social and racial inequalities are correlated with a higher CC risk and prevalence. The limited access to cervical cancer (CC) diagnosis services was related to organizational barriers and limited action by health professionals 33,37,38 .…”
Section: Care Line Milestonesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In Brazil, there is a legal definition of the maximum term for the initiation of treatment by the SUS of 60 days from the establishment of the diagnosis obtained with the biopsy result 39 . According to Nascimento e Silva 36 , this period was considered taking into account the onset of radiotherapy, by most of the "patients". The same study evidenced equiChart access to radiotherapy, that is, waiting time for the start of radiotherapy was lower as the cases were diagnosed with increased advanced stages (Chart 2).…”
Section: Access To Services For Treatment Of Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por exemplo, um estudo de coorte retrospectiva realizado em Taiwan com 9081 novos casos de câncer de colo de útero, entre 2005 e 2010 observou que as pacientes que atrasaram o tratamento por pelo menos 4 meses tiveram 2,31 vezes maior risco de mortalidade do que as pacientes submetidos a tratamento oportuno (p <0,05) 5 . A análise dos dados sobre possíveis atrasos para o diagnóstico e tratamento do câncer de colo de útero são de extrema importância para reduzir a morbidade e mortalidade pela doença e há poucos estudos realizados no Brasil sobre esse tema [6][7] . Assim, esse estudo objetivou identificar possíveis atrasos entre a suspeita diagnóstica, o diagnóstico definitivo e o início do tratamento em pacientes com câncer de colo de útero atendidas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) em um centro de referência para tratamento oncológico no Sul do Brasil.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…[8][9][10][11] The outcome was measured by the following variable of the PMAQ: "Estimated waiting time of users for specialized consultations -Physiotherapy (of users referred in the last three months)", with answers given in number of days.ResumoIntrodução: Historicamente, discute-se a dificuldade de encaminhamentos para o serviço especializado de saúde. Objetivo: de saúde que recebem apoio para o planejamento do processo de trabalho (n = 25,48; 83,4%; p < 0,0001), como também para a gestão que disponibiliza informações sobre a situação de saúde (n = 26,55; 86,8%; p < 0,0016), recebe apoio para a discussão dos dados de monitoramento (n = 24,149; 79,1%; p < 0,0001), recebe apoio institucional permanente (n = 25,14; 82,3%; p < 0,0001) e obtém retorno da avaliação realizada pelos especialistas (n = 22,80; 76,6%; p < 0,0001).…”
unclassified