Efecto de un programa de rehabilitación mediante entrenamiento en tapiz rodante con tareas duales en las alteraciones del equilibrio y la marcha en el daño cerebral adquirido

Aguilera-Rubio, Ángela; Fernández-González, P.; Molina‐Rueda, Francisco; Cuesta-Gómez, Alicia

doi:10.1016/j.rh.2018.02.002

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DT can be motor-cognitive, cognitive-cognitive or motor-motor [25]. In their daily lives, people usually divide their attention between performing motor tasks and cognitive activity at the same time [26][27][28], so it is necessary to determine the psychometric properties of the tests, including the reliability. Therefore, the main objective was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of performing the 30sCST test in people with T2DM, with and without DT (30sCST-DT).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of 30-s Chair Stand Test with and without Cognitive Task in People with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus

Barrios-Fernández

Pérez‐Gómez

Galán-Arroyo³

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Reliability refers to the precision of an assessment, so it is a critical topic to take the right decisions related to health management. People usually perform several tasks at the same time in their daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the 30-s chair stand test in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with test–retest, with and without dual-task (motor + cognitive task). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with T2DM and 30 subjects without T2DM performed the 30-s Chair Stand Test (30sCST) in which they must sit and stand as many times as possible in 30 s. They performed the test in the usual way (30sCST) and also with an additional cognitive task (30sCST-DT). A retest was conducted 7–14 days later. Results: Relative reliability was excellent in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). In 30sCST-DT, relative reliability was high in the T2DM group (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) and excellent in subjects without T2DM (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). Conclusions: The 30sCST and the 30sCST-DT tests are reliable tools for people with T2DM to measure changes after an intervention. The smallest real difference was 15% and 20% upper in the T2DM group in the 30sCST and 30sCST-DT tests, respectively.

show abstract