Een juridische bypass voor
                    innovaties

Philipsen, Stefan; Stamhuis, E.F.

doi:10.5553/rm/0920055x2019034003003

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

2020

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hoewel de naam 'sandboxes' het idee van een vrij spel zou kunnen wekken, gelden nog steeds juridische beperkingen. 55 Regulatory sandboxes of maatwerk voor innovatie onderscheiden zich van experimenteerwetgeving omdat deze 'experimenten' vaak binnen de discretionaire ruimte van toezichthouders worden geïmplementeerd. Experimenteerwetgeving is echter een breed begrip dat ook verwijst naar verschillende vormen van tijdelijke wetsbepalingen en wetgevingsinstrumenten waar er afgeweken wordt van bestaande wetgeving (experimenteerbepalingen, experimenteerregelingen, experiment(eer)wetten (tijdelijke wetten in formele zin), proeftuinen met een juridische dimensie en regelluwe zones).…”

unclassified

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Ranchordás¹

2020

RegelMaat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

unclassified

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Ranchordás¹

2020

RegelMaat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies¹

Philipsen

Stamhuis

Jong

2021

Regulation & Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many countries adhere to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development creed that innovation is good for the economy. Experiments are often used to intentionally create space for innovation. Decisions allowing experiments result in temporary legal enclaves for a few, excluding many others. Therefore, they come with risks. The aim of this article is to provide a set of guidelines that help improve the legal resilience of experimentation policies, so they are better able to withstand legal attacks when they occur. To do so, we first arranged the existing diversity of legal experiments in a theoretical model. Special attention was paid to two archetypes of legal experiments: statutory experiments and regulatory sandboxes. Second, we analyzed the impact of both types of experiments on four core legal principles: legality, certainty, equality, and public accountability. From this assessment, we eventually formulated a set of guidelines to secure or improve legal resilience.

show abstract

Een juridische bypass voor innovaties

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies¹

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Een juridische bypass voor innovaties

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Innovatie en betere regelgeving

Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies¹