2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47653-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG Signal Analysis and Classification

Abstract: of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
17

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
79
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…LS-SVM is a well-known classifier and is used in the classification of many biomedical signals, like electrocardiograph (ECG) signals [70], heart rate variability signals [71], cardiac sound signals [72], brain MRI classification [73], EEG signals [74,75], etc. In this work, the classification performance of the LS-SVM classifier is evaluated by employing the ten-fold cross-validation procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS-SVM is a well-known classifier and is used in the classification of many biomedical signals, like electrocardiograph (ECG) signals [70], heart rate variability signals [71], cardiac sound signals [72], brain MRI classification [73], EEG signals [74,75], etc. In this work, the classification performance of the LS-SVM classifier is evaluated by employing the ten-fold cross-validation procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important criteria of evaluation EEG are frequency. This is a criterion for assessing abnormalities in clinical EEG and for understanding functional behaviours in cognitive research [5].…”
Section: Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid stimulus artifact bias, training and testing subsets alternated the same number of trials with opposite stimulus polarity (Bidelman et al, 2013; Skoe & Kraus, 2010). To avoid sample selection bias, the selection of testing and training subsets was cross-validated using a K-fold partition, with K equal to the possible number of disjoint testing selections available in the corresponding tone dataset (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013; Siuly, Li, & Zhang, 2017). For example, if the testing size is 100 trials and the number of FFRs to the tone data set is 500, the possible number of disjoint testing selections is 5.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Modeling Of Neural Pitch Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%