2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG photic driving: Right-hemisphere reactivity deficit in childhood autism. A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence from pragmatic language measures (Ozonoff and Miller 1996;Siegal et al 1996), functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (Di Martino et al 2011;Jou et al 2010) and electrophysiological recordings (Lazarev et al 2009;Orekhova et al 2009) suggests that right hemisphere (RH) abnormalities may contribute to the development of these behaviours. Here, we investigate whether high levels of autistic-like traits are also linked to RH-based atypical biases in spatial attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from pragmatic language measures (Ozonoff and Miller 1996;Siegal et al 1996), functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (Di Martino et al 2011;Jou et al 2010) and electrophysiological recordings (Lazarev et al 2009;Orekhova et al 2009) suggests that right hemisphere (RH) abnormalities may contribute to the development of these behaviours. Here, we investigate whether high levels of autistic-like traits are also linked to RH-based atypical biases in spatial attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report indicated that significant mu suppression in both self and observed hand movements were evident in both groups [36]. In the same year, Lazarev et al [56] investigated the EEG photic driving at various stimulation frequencies (intermittent photic stimulation at 11 fixed frequencies, from 3 to 24 sec -1 , in 14 autistic boys (6-14 years old) and 21 control boys matched in age. The interhemispheric asymmetry in the total number of driving peaks in each group and the difference between autistic and control groups in each hemisphere were evaluated for each frequency band of the four harmonics in the nonvisual areas and the sum of four harmonics in both nonvisual and occipital visual areas.…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interhemispheric asymmetry in the total number of driving peaks in each group and the difference between autistic and control groups in each hemisphere were evaluated for each frequency band of the four harmonics in the nonvisual areas and the sum of four harmonics in both nonvisual and occipital visual areas. The researchers deduced that boys with autism showed latency abnormalities in the right-side hemisphere during the photic driving reactivity, particularly at the rapid alpha and beta frequencies of stimulation [56].…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lazarev et al [237] studied photic driving on the EEG, showing, in the group with autism, reduced driving on the right hemisphere, providing evidence for a neurophysiological disturbance within that hemisphere. With 128-channel ERPs, responses to face detection were weaker in the group with autism, suggesting aberrant neurophysiological processing of facial emotion [238].…”
Section: Evoked Potentials and Event-related Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%