2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG microstates are correlated with brain functional networks during slow-wave sleep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher number of microstate templates required to reach high GEV in neonates as compared to adults could be due to the fact that newborn EEG is typically recorded and analyzed during sleep, whereas adult studies are typically performed during awake state. To our knowledge, only two microstate studies in adults reported data during non-REM sleep (no microstate studies on adult REM sleep exist), indicating lower GEV values in comparison with those obtained for newborns: Brodbeck et al ( 2012 ) reported GEV between 60 and 67%, whereas Xu et al ( 2020 ) reported GEV values around 65%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher number of microstate templates required to reach high GEV in neonates as compared to adults could be due to the fact that newborn EEG is typically recorded and analyzed during sleep, whereas adult studies are typically performed during awake state. To our knowledge, only two microstate studies in adults reported data during non-REM sleep (no microstate studies on adult REM sleep exist), indicating lower GEV values in comparison with those obtained for newborns: Brodbeck et al ( 2012 ) reported GEV between 60 and 67%, whereas Xu et al ( 2020 ) reported GEV values around 65%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Brodbeck et al ( 2012 ) analyzed the microstate templates during different phases of the non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep state and showed that they had a relatively high degree of spatial correlation with those extracted during wakefulness. In another study, Xu et al ( 2020 ) investigated the relationship between fMRI fluctuations and microstates during slow wave sleep, revealing a correlation between EEG microstates and brain functional networks. Recently, Bréchet et al ( 2020 ) compared microstates during NREM sleep with microstates in wakefulness, showing that two microstates dominated sleep, with a different spectral content with respect to the microstates dominating wakefulness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary approach is to uncover associations between microstates and the well studied resting-state networks (RSNs) widely studied in fMRI, which have been associated with cognitive domains in large cohort studies (Smith et al, 2009). In sensor-space EEG, studies have demonstrated associations between microstates and fMRI-RSNS through convolution of the microstate time courses with a haemodynamic response function and general linear modelling (Britz et al, 2010; Musso et al, 2010; Van De Ville et al, 2010; Yuan et al, 2012; Abreu et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2020; Zoubi et al, 2020), or through correlations between RSNs and microstate statistics (Schumacher et al, 2019). An advantage of working in source space for this purpose is that spatial patterns of microstate activations can be associated with RSNs when directly comparable brain atlases are used for parcellation of the brain dynamics in the M/EEG and fMRI data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microstate analysis therefore does not require an arbitrarily chosen window length, and has minimal assumptions about the underlying generative process. Resting-state EEG microstates are robust and highly reproducible (Michel and Koenig, 2018), and have been associated with fMRI resting-state networks (Britz et al, 2010; Musso et al, 2010; Yuan et al, 2012; Schumacher et al, 2019; Abreu et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2020; Zoubi et al, 2020) and cognitive domains (Brodbeck et al, 2012; Britz et al, 2014; Milz et al, 2016; Seitzman et al, 2017; Zappasodi et al, 2019), earning EEG microstates the nickname the ‘atoms of thought’ (Lehmann, 1990). EEG microstates have also been demonstrated to be a potentially useful clinical tool for understanding and diagnosing neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias (Nishida et al, 2013; Musaeus et al, 2019; Smailovic et al, 2019; Schumacher et al, 2019; Tait et al, 2020b), schizophrenia (Lehmann et al, 2005; Andreou et al, 2014; Tomescu et al, 2014), and a range of other disorders (Khanna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microstate analysis therefore does not require an arbitrarily chosen window length, and has minimal assumptions about the underlying generative process. Resting-state EEG microstates are robust and highly reproducible 5 , and have been associated with fMRI resting-state networks [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and cognitive domains 13-16;18 , earning EEG microstates the nickname the 'atoms of thought' 41 . EEG microstates have also been demonstrated to be a potentially useful clinical tool for understanding and diagnosing neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and other dementias 37;42-45 , schizophrenia [46][47][48] , and a range of other disorders 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%