2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20102804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Abstract: Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets’ ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials—MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have evaluated usability and performance of emerging mobile systems and compared them to laboratory systems considered “gold standard” ( Guger et al, 2012 ; Pinegger et al, 2016 ; Di Flumeri et al, 2019 ). Recently, Jochumsen et al (2020a , b) evaluated not only the performance of several mobile EEG systems with respect to movement intention detection from the LFTD, but also evaluated their usability with regards to patients, relatives and therapists. Nevertheless, datasets eligible for quantifying different electrode sets are rather scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have evaluated usability and performance of emerging mobile systems and compared them to laboratory systems considered “gold standard” ( Guger et al, 2012 ; Pinegger et al, 2016 ; Di Flumeri et al, 2019 ). Recently, Jochumsen et al (2020a , b) evaluated not only the performance of several mobile EEG systems with respect to movement intention detection from the LFTD, but also evaluated their usability with regards to patients, relatives and therapists. Nevertheless, datasets eligible for quantifying different electrode sets are rather scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several low-cost commercial EEG systems have become available [ 18 ]. Some of these systems may not be useful for applications where neural plasticity is induced in the motor system, since they do not record electrical activity from the relevant brain areas [ 19 ]. However, it is possible to record the electrical activity of the motor cortex with some low-cost EEG systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such preparation process means that only trained researchers or clinicians can apply the system. It cannot be used independently by participants or patients at home which could be beneficial especially for clinical research and observation of neurological patients (Hinrichs et al, 2020;Jochumsen, Knoche, Kjaer, Dinesen, & Kidmose, 2020;Radüntz, 2018). The lengthy preparation process and skin abrasion are also not suitable for participants with sensory sensitivities, attention difficulties and restlessness which are often observed in neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ASD) and may be problematic for young children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No metal parts of the electrodes come into direct contact with the skin, there is no need for skin preparation or washing hair and the procedure is generally less time consuming in comparison to the gel-based electrode systems. The quality of EEG recordings using waterbased electrodes have only been evaluated in the context of brain computer interface (BCI) designs (Jochumsen et al, 2020;Pinegger et al, 2016) and the results are promising. The noise levels during a short circuit recording expressed as the root mean square values were the lowest in a water-based compared to gel-based and dry electrode systems (Pinegger et al, 2016) and the signal to noise ratio was comparable between water-and gel-based systems (Jochumsen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%