1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00038-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG coherence or EEG correlation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the ThinkGear system is convenient and wireless, there is a minor trade-off in terms of data quality compared to conventional lab-based systems (Johnstone et al, 2012), and a major trade-off in the number of recording locations. Furthermore, a single channel of data does not permit computational methods such as coherence (Guevara and Corsi-Cabrera, 1996), source HEADSET EEG RELIABILITY 28 localization (Jatoi et al, 2014), or event-related potentials (Woodman, 2010). However, not all clinical populations will tolerate, and not all research approaches require such designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the ThinkGear system is convenient and wireless, there is a minor trade-off in terms of data quality compared to conventional lab-based systems (Johnstone et al, 2012), and a major trade-off in the number of recording locations. Furthermore, a single channel of data does not permit computational methods such as coherence (Guevara and Corsi-Cabrera, 1996), source HEADSET EEG RELIABILITY 28 localization (Jatoi et al, 2014), or event-related potentials (Woodman, 2010). However, not all clinical populations will tolerate, and not all research approaches require such designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All epochs contaminated by noise were removed to ensure that all signals analyzed were artifact-free. Later, these EEGs were analyzed by the EEG Magic software [30] that initially calculated the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to seven frequency bands: delta (1 -3 Hz), theta (4 -7 Hz), alpha1 (8 -10 Hz), alpha2 (11 -13 Hz), beta1 (14 -19 Hz), beta2 (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and gamma (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). The correlation spectrum (r) was then calculated from the autospectra and the cross-spectrum of the signals to provide values between −1 and +1.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation is sensitive to both the phase and polarity of the signal, regardless of amplitude [31]. Finally, in order to approximate to a normal distribution, the correlation values were transformed into Z scores before beginning statistical analysis.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also discussed the effects of coherence training on follow-up quantitative electroencephalograms (QEEGs) and the changes produced by neurofeedback in the QEEG (Guevara & Corsi-Cabrera, 1996;Marosi et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%