2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-based seizure detection in patients with intellectual disability: Which EEG and clinical factors are important?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since focal seizures often affect a smaller brain region, the changes of ACS (i.e., average PS level) may be not significant across patients. Another reason may be the regular occurrence of a slow activity (i.e., seizure imitators) in the background EEG of patients with an ID [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since focal seizures often affect a smaller brain region, the changes of ACS (i.e., average PS level) may be not significant across patients. Another reason may be the regular occurrence of a slow activity (i.e., seizure imitators) in the background EEG of patients with an ID [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the performance of automated seizure detection for ID patients remains unclear. Our previous study [26] shows that the automated detection is difficult for minor seizures that show blurry boundaries associated with abnormal background EEG signals. The traditional EEG feature-based seizure detection methods [20,22,27] may have limitations on detecting these minor seizures because they do not 28.9 ± 13.7 12-51…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We extracted the commonly used time-frequency and the morphological EEG features. For the features in the time-frequency domain, we calculated wavelet decomposition (WD) coefficients (Sharma et al 2014), the mean and standard deviation of distances between signal peaks and troughs, and the signal sample entropy (Wang et al 2019). The morphological features were extracted using VG methods (Wang et al 2017b).…”
Section: Features Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%