2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-based intention recognition with deep recurrent-convolution neural network: Performance and channel selection by Grad-CAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without adjusting the hyper-parameters determined using Dataset-A, the model was then tested on Dataset-B, as explained in Section 2.1. The results of this generalization test are presented in Table 2, and show that the proposed method outperformed other baseline models and a Gradient-Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) channel selection method proposed in [11]. Performance was close to, although slightly less than, that of a cascaded CRNN approach proposed in [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without adjusting the hyper-parameters determined using Dataset-A, the model was then tested on Dataset-B, as explained in Section 2.1. The results of this generalization test are presented in Table 2, and show that the proposed method outperformed other baseline models and a Gradient-Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) channel selection method proposed in [11]. Performance was close to, although slightly less than, that of a cascaded CRNN approach proposed in [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The activities included eyes closed, imagining opening/closing left fist, imagining opening/closing right fist, imagining opening/closing both fists, and imagining opening/closing both feet. The data from 108 participants (subject #89 was excluded as suggested in previous works [8,11]), were modeled using the proposed framework by randomly selecting 75% for the training and the remaining 25% for testing, as employed in [11].…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39]. The EEG signals can be divided into four rhythms according to the frequency band distribution: δ (1-4 Hz), θ (4-8 Hz), α (8-12 Hz) and β (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The multitaper spectral estimation method based on PSD is used to calculate the average PSDs in one epoch of each channel [40,41], namely p f req,ch (i).…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alyasser et al promoted an EEG channel selection method based on the binary flower pollination algorithm (FPA) and β-hill climbing for personal identification [26], which showed that half of the channel numbers can achieve high accuracy. Li et al applied the Gradient Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization technology on raw EEG signals to the channel selection [27]. The results achieved an optimal tradeoff between performance and the number of channels for EEG intention decoding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the approaches for building class activation mapping-based (CAM) visualizations have increased interest in MI research, which performs a weighted sum of the feature maps of the last convolutional layer for each class using and a structural regularizer for preventing overfitting during training [32,33]. Specifically, the visualizations generated by gradient-based methods such as GradCam provide explanations with fine-grained details of the predicted class [34][35][36]. However, the CNN-learned features to be highlighted for interpretation purposes must be compatible with the neurophysiological principle of MI [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%