2008
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG alpha oscillations in the preparation for global and local processing predict behavioral performance

Abstract: Visual attention can be directed either to the global features of a display or to the local elements that make up the display. We investigated whether oscillatory brain responses to globally or locally directed cue stimuli predict behavioral performance in subsequent target processing. Induced alpha band (8-12 Hz) amplitudes in the pre-stimulus interval were measured separately for the global and the local level, where individual trials were assigned to one of three groups according to the response speed towar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
41
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3c) revealed a non-significant tendency for longer reaction times in the global than in the focal condition (main effect of condition (F(1,10) = 3.45, p = 0.09), while the effect of different female/male ratios and interactions were nonsignificant. This finding suggests that only by manipulating the experimental task (focal vs. global attention), we are able to manipulate the subjects' decision, similarly to previous studies (Navon 1977;Romei et al 2012;Sasaki et al 2001;Volberg et al 2009), using textures or letters. Altogether, the results of Experiment 1 support that the observers are able to process MFS globally by extracting the statistical average of the presented gender composition.…”
Section: Imaging Parameters and Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3c) revealed a non-significant tendency for longer reaction times in the global than in the focal condition (main effect of condition (F(1,10) = 3.45, p = 0.09), while the effect of different female/male ratios and interactions were nonsignificant. This finding suggests that only by manipulating the experimental task (focal vs. global attention), we are able to manipulate the subjects' decision, similarly to previous studies (Navon 1977;Romei et al 2012;Sasaki et al 2001;Volberg et al 2009), using textures or letters. Altogether, the results of Experiment 1 support that the observers are able to process MFS globally by extracting the statistical average of the presented gender composition.…”
Section: Imaging Parameters and Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Previous experiments, using simple geometrical patterns or letters, arranged in a way that they form another, global pattern or letter (Navon 1977;Romei et al 2012;Sasaki et al 2001;Scherf et al 2009;Volberg et al 2009) suggest that separate systems control attention at the local and global levels (for a review see Sasaki 2007). Our current results are not excluding this possibility: the relatively longer reaction times, observed for the global when compared to local condition suggest different neural mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations