1968
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s1-43.1.368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edward Carey Francis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we will not be very surprised if we find the same mistake again in the new Iiterature (as several times in the past). This fact, which has been overseen by many authors during the last 100 years and as many times corrected afterwards, is explained for example in PARS (31], NEIMARK&FUFAEV (28] and in WHITTAKER [44]. These authors show that the equations of motion of a dynamical system with non-holonomic constraints cannot be obtained via calculus of variations by applying the multiplier rule in the usual way.…”
Section: Nonholonomic Systems: An Elementary But Common Mistakementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, we will not be very surprised if we find the same mistake again in the new Iiterature (as several times in the past). This fact, which has been overseen by many authors during the last 100 years and as many times corrected afterwards, is explained for example in PARS (31], NEIMARK&FUFAEV (28] and in WHITTAKER [44]. These authors show that the equations of motion of a dynamical system with non-holonomic constraints cannot be obtained via calculus of variations by applying the multiplier rule in the usual way.…”
Section: Nonholonomic Systems: An Elementary But Common Mistakementioning
confidence: 89%
“…This caused the search for more general variational principles as well as for new formalisms for obtaining the correct equations of motion for non-holonomic systems. Since this fact falls into oblivion with regularity, it might be useful to illustrate it with an example borrowed from PARS [31] (see pages 529 and 530). Consider a particle P with position characterized by the cartesian Coordinates (x, y, z) in inertial space and subjected to the single non-holonomic constraint …”
Section: Nonholonomic Systems: An Elementary But Common Mistakementioning
confidence: 98%