2016
DOI: 10.1515/sem-2016-0124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square

Abstract: In this article we examine the educational process and learning from the edusemiotic point of view in terms of meaningful experience and meaningful action. A conception of meaningful experience is central in many branches of educational thinking, from pragmatism to existentialism. We analyze this conception from two traditional and somewhat remote perspectives, utilizing some themes of Kant’s educational philosophy on the one hand and Greimas’ semiotics on the other. Kant’s views of human formative powers – Bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the teacher can cooperate with the internal teacher of the student, but that requires that considerable prior learning has taken place and that the teacher can motivate the students. If this cooperation is successful, then the student starts to study, which is equivalent to teaching oneself (This negativity as a basic character of education is perhaps more intelligible in the continental tradition starting with the post-Kantian pedagogical paradox [56][57][58] and it is exceptionally explicitly reflected by Dietrich Benner in [59,60]).…”
Section: Conclusion: Education As Negative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the teacher can cooperate with the internal teacher of the student, but that requires that considerable prior learning has taken place and that the teacher can motivate the students. If this cooperation is successful, then the student starts to study, which is equivalent to teaching oneself (This negativity as a basic character of education is perhaps more intelligible in the continental tradition starting with the post-Kantian pedagogical paradox [56][57][58] and it is exceptionally explicitly reflected by Dietrich Benner in [59,60]).…”
Section: Conclusion: Education As Negative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semiotic or Greimas square could be treated as a type of extended dichotomies. Scholars apply the semiotic square by analyzing human cognition [43], heuristic aspects of social existence [44], educational process [45], (anti)brand meanings [46] and even Western astrology [47]. Besides this, it has been used in literary criticism [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This negativity as a basic character of education is perhaps more intelligible in the continental tradition starting with the post-Kantian pedagogical paradox[56][57][58] and it is exceptionally explicitly reflected by Dietrich Benner in[59,60] 33 And thus, also the action of consciousness. Here is a strong and interesting parallel connection to the philosophy of Fichte, which, however, must be bypassed in this article (see more in[13,63]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%