2016
DOI: 10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model

Abstract: There are many models of evaluation that can be used to evaluate a program. However, the most commonly used is the context, input, process, output (CIPP) evaluation models. CIPP evaluation model developed by Stufflebeam and Shinkfield in 1985. The evaluation context is used to give a rational reason a selected program or curriculum to be implemented. A wide scale, context can be evaluated on: the program's objectives, policies that support the vision and mission of the institution, the relevant environment, id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Input component evaluation to be able to obtain appropriate and suitable resources for use in mathematics learning (Warju, 2016). Such resources are human resources, infrastructure, time, and content (Aziz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Input Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input component evaluation to be able to obtain appropriate and suitable resources for use in mathematics learning (Warju, 2016). Such resources are human resources, infrastructure, time, and content (Aziz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Input Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the evaluation of product emphasizes the extent to which results have been achieved in accordance with the desired goals, and whether an activity needs to be stopped, continued, improved and so on. Evaluation of the product has the purpose of linking information about the results with the goals, setting, carrying capacity, and predetermined processes [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yusuf (2015) explains that product evaluation is done at the end of an activity and is intended to measure the achievement of the objectives that have been determined before based on a particular standard or criteria. This finding is supported by theories (Arikunto, 2009;Stufflebeam & Shinkfield, 2007) and findings (Warju, 2016;Zhang et al, 2011) that the final evaluation (product) relates information on the final achievement to the objectives, context, input, and process that have been implemented before it.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%