2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational performance of pediatric cochlear implant recipients in mainstream classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
38
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Part C: we found that the mean scores of Persian literature improved by 1.2 marks; the mean scores of mathematics were higher than literature scores. These results were consistent with the findings reported by Mukari et al (25) and Traxler (26), who studied the educational performance of hard-of-hearing children. Their findings indicated that the subjects' language performance was weaker than their math skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Part C: we found that the mean scores of Persian literature improved by 1.2 marks; the mean scores of mathematics were higher than literature scores. These results were consistent with the findings reported by Mukari et al (25) and Traxler (26), who studied the educational performance of hard-of-hearing children. Their findings indicated that the subjects' language performance was weaker than their math skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These figures were reported as being very similar to those for the general population of France, where 53% of individuals have at least a high school diploma (Venail et al, 2010). A third study of Malaysian children reported that for children implanted relatively late (aged 3-4 years), 56% performed below the average level academically, with greatest achievement in mathematics rather than language (Mukari et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literacy and Academic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…[2][3][4][5] Várias pesquisas têm sustentado os efeitos deste método de reabilitação na diminuição do impacto da surdez, que se traduz na recuperação da capacidade auditiva, percepção dos sons e parâmetros segmentais da fala e, por conseguinte, no desenvolvimento da linguagem oral em crianças implantadas precocemente. 1,[6][7][8][9][10] O implante coclear, sobretudo quando realizado antes dos três anos de idade, permite que a criança esteja exposta aos sons durante o designado período crítico, no qual se Ramos D, et al Implante coclear e surdez congénita, Acta Med Port 2015 Jul-Aug;28 (4): [442][443][444][445][446][447] desenvolvem as capacidades neurológicas que permitem uma melhor aprendizagem da linguagem e da fala.…”
unclassified