1986
DOI: 10.1080/0300443860230404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational issues concerning young children and microcomputers: Lego with logo?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barnes and Hill (1983) stated that preoperational children cannot classify, yet research shows that young children can classify objects taxonomically (Mervis and Crisafi, 1982;Nelson, 1973;Rosch, Mervis, Gay, Boynes-Braem, and Johnson, 1979;Ross, 1980) depending on the level of stimuli they are shown: basic rather than superordinate or subordinate (Sugarman, 1979). Watson, et al (1986) reviewed young child/computer literature and found that neither recent cognitive theory nor research data supported the "concrete stage only" viewpoint.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Barnes and Hill (1983) stated that preoperational children cannot classify, yet research shows that young children can classify objects taxonomically (Mervis and Crisafi, 1982;Nelson, 1973;Rosch, Mervis, Gay, Boynes-Braem, and Johnson, 1979;Ross, 1980) depending on the level of stimuli they are shown: basic rather than superordinate or subordinate (Sugarman, 1979). Watson, et al (1986) reviewed young child/computer literature and found that neither recent cognitive theory nor research data supported the "concrete stage only" viewpoint.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 95%
“…PRESENT controversy over the microcomputer's monster/messiah characteristics (Shepard, 1985), premature conclusions that preschool children should not work with computers (Barnes and Hill, 1983;Bass, 1985;Brady and Hill, 1984;CufFaro, 1984;Tan, 1985;Sprigle and Schaefer, 1984;Zajonc, 1984), recent re-evaluation of the preschool child's cognitive abilities (Gelman and Baillargeon, 1983;Papert, 1980;Watson, Nida, and Shade;, and questions about how mothers will teach their young children to use a microcomputer led to the research reported in this article. A goal central to our research was to provide additional data in the hope of resolving the controversy as to whether or not preschool children should work with microcomputers.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last decade, however, researchers have reported studies in which some positive impact on children's learning was identified. One set of studies described value to children within the context of the relationship between action on the computer keyboard to events on peripheral equipment (Hoot, 1986;Watson, Nida, & Shade, 1986). They noted that although computers have limitations, they serve to stimulate a variety of beneficial cognitive encounters for young children through graphics, touch screens, mouse manipulation, sound, and immediacy of response, among others.…”
Section: Computers In the Early Childhood Setting--a Continuing Debatementioning
confidence: 97%
“…One-third of the three-year-olds manipulated the oomputer and task independently. The abstract microcomputer task was shown to be no more difficult for young children than was the concrete doll house task.A number of researchers have called for a period of intensive testing to determine the proper role for the microcomputer in early childhood education [1][2][3]. Data are currently available to show that young children can manipulate the standard microcomputer configuration [4-10], work successfully alone or in small groups [5,8,11,12], manage meaningful microcomputer tasks as young as two to three years of age [8,[12][13][14][15][16], operate and learn from computer…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%