1998
DOI: 10.1080/03124079808411230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational and organisational contexts of professional supervision in the 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students are expected as practitioners to incorporate supervision into their practice. Supervision for graduates should, according to Lewis (1998), focus on accountability and best practice.…”
Section: Support From Professional Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students are expected as practitioners to incorporate supervision into their practice. Supervision for graduates should, according to Lewis (1998), focus on accountability and best practice.…”
Section: Support From Professional Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Lewis (1998; p. 31) emphasises, for those seeking to further their understanding of the nature of supervision, it is perhaps surprising to find that there is still some confusion about what constitutes the act of supervision. A rather simplistic explanation of supervision regularly espoused by supervisees, is that a supervisor is someone with ‘ super‐vision ’.…”
Section: So What Is Supervision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both the idea of supervision as an ongoing process and the definitions of functions outlined above are not universally accepted. Within the social work literature, Lewis (1987; p. 19) quotes a number of practitioners (e.g. Wax 1963 and Mandell 1973, cited in Lewis 1987) who advocate time‐limited supervision, appealing for autonomy, equality and a reduction in the need for ongoing supervision.…”
Section: So What Is Supervision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prospect of legal, professional or organisational sanctions, if failing to follow designated steps, has affected how practice is monitored. The reductionism of competency-based policy in agencies risks breaking practice into small constituent parts, which may not represent the nature of the day-to-day work or be influenced by the service user’s presenting needs (Lewis, 1998). In the North American context, the literature suggests that supervision policies and procedures have eroded practitioners’ autonomy and prerogatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%