1991
DOI: 10.1086/444004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education, Social Reform, and the State: ESEA and Federal Education Policy in the 1960s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some schools were never integrated and some are currently experiencing resegregation (Orfield and Yun 1999;Borman et al 2004;Orfield and Lee 2005). The ESEA was part of a national priority to combat poverty (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009). The funds were used for Title I programs that target educationally disadvantaged students (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some schools were never integrated and some are currently experiencing resegregation (Orfield and Yun 1999;Borman et al 2004;Orfield and Lee 2005). The ESEA was part of a national priority to combat poverty (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009). The funds were used for Title I programs that target educationally disadvantaged students (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESEA was part of a national priority to combat poverty (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009). The funds were used for Title I programs that target educationally disadvantaged students (Kantor 1991;Urban and Wagoner 2009). The ESEA suffered from lax oversight and no prescribed program (Kantor 1991).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations