2006
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education or employment—choices facing young people in Kazakhstan

Abstract: This paper considers the links between education and employment in Kazakhstan. Using a sample of 12 000 Kazakhstani households, we analyse the factors determining the choice made by young adults between education and work within a multinomial logit framework. Our results confirm that while men are more likely to work and to remain unemployed, women are actually much more likely than men to study further. The main findings of the paper are firstly, contrary to studies elsewhere in the world, the family's income… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the education received gives the opportunity to choose a place of work in the future, which expands the opportunities of young people. Interestingly, parental education predicts children's educational attainment (Kalyuzhnova & Kambhampati, 2007). This trend does not have gender stereotypes in large cities of Kazakhstan since, in most cities, both men and women are employed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, the education received gives the opportunity to choose a place of work in the future, which expands the opportunities of young people. Interestingly, parental education predicts children's educational attainment (Kalyuzhnova & Kambhampati, 2007). This trend does not have gender stereotypes in large cities of Kazakhstan since, in most cities, both men and women are employed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the context of Kazakhstan, there was rather low interest in the issue of online employment (Kalyuzhnova & Kambhampati, 2007;Khamzin et al, 2016;Buribayev & Khamzina, 2019;Sadik-Zada, 2021). However, some authors discussed the possible pros and cons of the online format of work, relying on empirical material and guided mainly by theoretical conclusions (Mussurov & Arabsheibani, 2015;Baitenizov et al, 2018;Spankulova et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above gives grounds for concluding that it is impossible to apply only those criteria that can be clothed in the form of law. The use of other categorical constructions will not allow using the legislative mechanism for their assessment or will require expanding the boundaries of subjective discretion (Kalyuzhnova & Kambhampati, 2007;Karatayev & Hall, 2020). In the latter case, the entities conducting the assessment must meet maximum impartiality criteria in resolving the relevant issue.…”
Section: Generalization Of Main Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%