Geographies of Global Issues: Change and Threat 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4585-95-8_21-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education, International Volunteering, and Citizenship: Young People’s Subjectivities and Geographies of Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research attention on the geographies of education has expanded rapidly in quantity and scope (Waters, 2016). Part of this expansion includes generative synergies across multiple diverse areas of research, including: critical geographies of education, radical youth work and participatory research (Dickens, 2017); shifting infrastructures, financial capital and geographies of schooling (Cohen and Rosenman, 2020); cultural and affective geographies (Ang and Ho, 2019); critical race theory (Hunter, 2020); children's and young people's geographies (Baillie Smith et al, 2016); and educational landscapes, neoliberalism and the 'social reproduction of enduring regimes of power' (Holloway and Kirby, 2019: 164), often understanding 'schools as key sites at which issues such as power, identity, citizenship and participation are illuminated' (Pini et al, 2017: 14). Holloway et al, (2010) draw attention to the ways in which unruly neoliberal logics, government policy and market responses from individuals and companies might be productively explored through the geographies of education, offering an example of Thiem's (2009) argument that education is not a 'discrete topical speciality' but instead is a resource for decentred and outward-looking research, 'one in which education systems, institutions, and practices are positioned as useful sites for a variety of theory-building projects' (p.154).…”
Section: Geographies Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research attention on the geographies of education has expanded rapidly in quantity and scope (Waters, 2016). Part of this expansion includes generative synergies across multiple diverse areas of research, including: critical geographies of education, radical youth work and participatory research (Dickens, 2017); shifting infrastructures, financial capital and geographies of schooling (Cohen and Rosenman, 2020); cultural and affective geographies (Ang and Ho, 2019); critical race theory (Hunter, 2020); children's and young people's geographies (Baillie Smith et al, 2016); and educational landscapes, neoliberalism and the 'social reproduction of enduring regimes of power' (Holloway and Kirby, 2019: 164), often understanding 'schools as key sites at which issues such as power, identity, citizenship and participation are illuminated' (Pini et al, 2017: 14). Holloway et al, (2010) draw attention to the ways in which unruly neoliberal logics, government policy and market responses from individuals and companies might be productively explored through the geographies of education, offering an example of Thiem's (2009) argument that education is not a 'discrete topical speciality' but instead is a resource for decentred and outward-looking research, 'one in which education systems, institutions, and practices are positioned as useful sites for a variety of theory-building projects' (p.154).…”
Section: Geographies Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What these accounts highlight is a tendency to overlook the journeys across difference within smaller or alternative spatial scales that volunteering of different kinds may enable, as well as those that do not fit within the short and prescribed timeframes of development projects. The non-elite cosmopolitanisms of national, local, diaspora or forcibly displaced volunteers are often absent, or viewed through the prism of their experiences of and encounters with international volunteers (Baillie Smith et al 2016, Sin 2010. The obvious implication here is the reproduction of the historical conflation of cosmopolitanism with international mobility; as Schiller et al (2011, 404) argue, while transnational mobilities and connections may provide possibilities for cosmopolitanism, mobility is not necessarily cosmopolitan, and nor does cosmopolitanism require mobility.…”
Section: Volunteering Cosmopolitanism and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of global North-led aid and development, and its colonial contingencies, power asymmetries and neoliberal citizenships (Baillie Smith et al, 2016;Baillie Smith et al, 2013;Griffiths, 2015;Kothari, 2005;Lyons et al, 2012;McEwan & Mawdsley, 2012). Such geographies, thus, both critique and privilege particular types of volunteer and the institutions that facilitate their work, producing a narrow account of the local and transnational relationalities of volunteering and development .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%