2018
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1467556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education for what? Shaping the field of climate change education with children and young people as co-researchers

Abstract: Cutter-Mackenzie, A and Rousell, DS (2018) Education for What? Shaping the field of climate change education with children and young people as coresearchers. Children's Geographies, 17 (1). pp. 90-104.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach of CC fragmentation is often referred to in the literature as cross-curriculum integration. While this approach is widespread, the disintegration, dispersal and subsuming of CC under existing curriculum subjects, has often been criticised for jeopardising CC education [36,[52][53][54]. Potential damaging risks of CC education fragmentation include: (i) The omission of critical linkages between the various pieces of information taught in different subjects [49]; (ii) lack of collaboration between the disciplinary teachers in regard to CC education [24]; (iii) teachers perceiving CC as an add-on, unrelated to their discipline and therefore not engaging with CC education in their unwillingness to transcend beyond the boundaries of their disciplines; (iv) teachers' lack of expertese [23,29,50,[55][56][57]; and (v) inadequate time for covering CC appropriately within the already crowded disciplines space [23,48].…”
Section: Integrating CC Education Within School Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach of CC fragmentation is often referred to in the literature as cross-curriculum integration. While this approach is widespread, the disintegration, dispersal and subsuming of CC under existing curriculum subjects, has often been criticised for jeopardising CC education [36,[52][53][54]. Potential damaging risks of CC education fragmentation include: (i) The omission of critical linkages between the various pieces of information taught in different subjects [49]; (ii) lack of collaboration between the disciplinary teachers in regard to CC education [24]; (iii) teachers perceiving CC as an add-on, unrelated to their discipline and therefore not engaging with CC education in their unwillingness to transcend beyond the boundaries of their disciplines; (iv) teachers' lack of expertese [23,29,50,[55][56][57]; and (v) inadequate time for covering CC appropriately within the already crowded disciplines space [23,48].…”
Section: Integrating CC Education Within School Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this careful exploration of voice occurred in the 1990s and early 2000s, as many of the citations here reflect. Since that time, co-research has been often claimed as a given, and the probing of participation, and the questioning of claims for giving voice or empowering children are not always acknowledged (e.g., Cutter-Mackenzie & Rousell, 2019;Murray, 2017;Warham, 2012).…”
Section: Childhood Children's and Youths' Voices And Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental education particularly on global warming and climate change provide opportunity for inquiry, when it is inclusive of and led by young people. This would populate next generation of leaders who are not avoiding climate change in their policies, decisions, and actions (Cutter-Mackenzie & Roussel, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%