2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1285605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education Finance Reform in the American States: A Discrete-Time Competing Risks Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The federal government has devolved more responsibility to state governments in recent decades, and citizens have subsequently turned to state courts for policy clarification and policy making. State supreme courts have also overturned public education finance systems in many states, beginning in New Jersey in 1973 (Cann and Wilhelm 2008). The Florida Supreme Court provoked international attention in 2000 when the fate of the U.S. presidential election fell into the hands of its justices ( Gore v. Harris , 772 So.2d 1243).…”
Section: Case Salience and State Courts Of Last Resortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The federal government has devolved more responsibility to state governments in recent decades, and citizens have subsequently turned to state courts for policy clarification and policy making. State supreme courts have also overturned public education finance systems in many states, beginning in New Jersey in 1973 (Cann and Wilhelm 2008). The Florida Supreme Court provoked international attention in 2000 when the fate of the U.S. presidential election fell into the hands of its justices ( Gore v. Harris , 772 So.2d 1243).…”
Section: Case Salience and State Courts Of Last Resortmentioning
confidence: 99%