Education in the Era of Globalization
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5945-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education As Subjectivity: Three Perspectives On The Construction Of Subjectivity And The Position Of Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the second highest percentage based on the average was the question about the “educational tools” used in the seminar (mean value: 4.41, SD: 0.751) ( Table 3 ). One of the most interesting results from the analysis was the average percentage regarding the “knowledge” they acquired (theoretical background investigation) on the subject (mean value: 3.97, SD: 0.894) ( Table 3 ), something that is purely subjective for each individual [ 123 ]. In addition, we see that the degree of satisfaction in terms of “time” (mean value: 3.92, SD: 0.744), “venue” (mean value: 3.66, SD: 0.776), and “period” (mean value: 4.05, SD: 0.746) of the seminar have the lowest percentages compared to the other questions, while the choices on the five-point Likert scale ranged mainly on the choices from 2 to 4 (“Poor” to “Good”) ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the second highest percentage based on the average was the question about the “educational tools” used in the seminar (mean value: 4.41, SD: 0.751) ( Table 3 ). One of the most interesting results from the analysis was the average percentage regarding the “knowledge” they acquired (theoretical background investigation) on the subject (mean value: 3.97, SD: 0.894) ( Table 3 ), something that is purely subjective for each individual [ 123 ]. In addition, we see that the degree of satisfaction in terms of “time” (mean value: 3.92, SD: 0.744), “venue” (mean value: 3.66, SD: 0.776), and “period” (mean value: 4.05, SD: 0.746) of the seminar have the lowest percentages compared to the other questions, while the choices on the five-point Likert scale ranged mainly on the choices from 2 to 4 (“Poor” to “Good”) ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, following the correlation of questions related to the parameters of educational effectiveness (i.e., organization, interesting suggestion, discussion time, question/answers, knowledge, time, venue, period, and classroom equipment) (see Table 11), and answering the RQ1, we see that a well-organized lecture with interesting suggestions manages to achieve its goal and satisfy the budding journalists' expectations (Table 12). In the same framework, the acquired knowledge (theoretical background investigation) on the subject is also correlated with the expectations (Table 12), something that is purely subjective for every individual (Nordtug 2007). Based on the above result, we can say that this may be due to the proper planning of a lesson plan (including educational activities, educational techniques, and/or communication tools, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The largest percentage of option 5 ("Excellent") was presented in the "questions/answers" made at the end of the interactive teaching (49 budding journalists, with a percentage of 79%). Regarding the averages, the question which gained the highest percentage was also the "questions/answers" at the end of the interactive teaching (mean value: 4.77, SD: 0.459), while the lowest percentage was on the "knowledge" they acquired (theoretical background investigation) on the subject (mean value: 4.27, SD: 0.772), something that is purely subjective for every individual (Nordtug 2007). This low percentage was expected, because the interactive teaching was held in the last lecture of each respective course, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Acquired Knowledge Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some educational philosophers have argued that the pressure for uniformity through mapping, measuring, international surveys and tests, laws and regulations, supports an understanding of education as the simple acquisition of knowledge and skills. Such an understanding is too simple, maintain these theorists, who speak in favour of the German word Bildung (Løvlie et al, 2003;Nordtug, 2007). Some theorists have, however, expressed a certain concern that the project of Bildung can result in even more uniformity by way of a grand humanistic project, focusing on common virtues, such as autonomy, rationality, moral capacity, self-directedness and selfknowledge (Todd, 2008b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%