Education and wealth inequalities in healthy ageing in eight harmonised cohorts in the ATHLOS consortium: a population-based study

Abstract

Background The rapid growth of the size of the older population is having a substantial effect on health and social care services in many societies across the world. Maintaining health and functioning in older age is a key public health issue but few studies have examined factors associated with inequalities in trajectories of health and functioning across countries. The aim of this study was to investigate trajectories of healthy ageing in older men and women (aged ≥45 years) and the effect of education and wealth on these trajectories.Methods This population-based study is based on eight longitudinal cohorts from Australia, the USA, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, and Europe harmonised by the EU Ageing Trajectories of Health: Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies (ATHLOS) consortium. We selected these studies from the repository of 17 ageing studies in the ATHLOS consortium because they reported at least three waves of collected data. We used multilevel modelling to investigate the effect of education and wealth on trajectories of healthy ageing scores, which incorporated 41 items of physical and cognitive functioning with a range between 0 (poor) and 100 (good), after adjustment for age, sex, and cohort study.Findings We used data from 141 214 participants, with a mean age of 62•9 years (SD 10•1) and an age range of 45-106 years, of whom 76 484 (54•2%) were women. The earliest year of baseline data was 1992 and the most recent last follow-up year was 2015. Education and wealth affected baseline scores of healthy ageing but had little effect on the rate of decrease in healthy ageing score thereafter. Compared with those with primary education or less, participants with tertiary education had higher baseline scores (adjusted difference in score of 10•54 points, 95% CI 10•31-10•77). The adjusted difference in healthy ageing score between lowest and highest quintiles of wealth was 8•98 points (95% CI 8•74-9•22). Among the eight cohorts, the strongest inequality gradient for both education and wealth was found in the Health Retirement Study from the USA.Interpretation The apparent difference in baseline healthy ageing scores between those with high versus low education levels and wealth suggests that cumulative disadvantage due to low education and wealth might have largely deteriorated health conditions in early life stages, leading to persistent differences throughout older age, but no further increase in ageing disparity after age 70 years. Future research should adopt a lifecourse approach to investigate mechanisms of health inequalities across education and wealth in different societies.

Prevalence and Correlates of Healthy Aging Among Elderly Aged 65 Years and Over — 6 PLADs, China, 2019

“…The prevalence found in this study was lower, however, than that of a comparable study conducted in Singapore in 2013 (19.6%), and the difference was most likely related to the higher prevalence of 'active engagement with life' in Singapore (8). However, the results of this study showed a higher prevalence than the mean level of European countries (8.5%) from 2004 to 2007 (9). The discrepancy across studies is also likely related to the inconsistent measurements of components of healthy aging, especially the dimension of "high physical function" and "active engagement with life."…”

Analysis of Medical Seeking Behavior and Influencing Factors in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

“…Many studies have shown that the higher the education and the income level of patients, the higher the importance and compliance with the disease, the higher the degree of cooperation in daily medical work, and the better the disease control. 30,31,32,33,34 Our research results also fully re ected this. With the increase in education years and income levels, the diagnosis delay of patients continued to decrease.…”

Putting cumulative (dis)advantages in context: Comparing the role of educational inequality in later-life functional health trajectories in England and Germany

“…Previously, studies testing the CAD hypothesis focused exclusively on one institutional context (e.g., ). However, a new wave of research [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] strengthens the argument that a fourth central principle, namely how country context modifies the way in which CAD processes unfold over time, is needed to further a deeper understanding of CAD as a dynamic, contextualised process within social systems.…”