Education and the Logic of Economic Progress

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the idea that education should function to promote economic progress has played a major role in shaping educational policy. So far, however, philosophers of education have shown relatively little interest in analysing this notion and its implications. The present article critically examines, from a philosophical perspective, the link between education and the currently prevailing understanding of economic progress, which is grounded in human capital theory. A number of familiar philosophical objections to the idea that economic progress is a worthy educational aim are raised, but it is held that many of these objections stem from a partial understanding of economic theory. The article then moves on to investigate the foundations of human capital theory's conception of economic progress. It is argued that there are inherent tensions between the philosophical foundations of the economist's conception of progress and the very essence of education. The article concludes by suggesting that in order to resolve these tensions we should consider grounding the economic theory that guides educational policy-making in an intersubjective or objective conception of welfare.

Opening the Black-Box in Lifelong E-Learning for Employability: A Framework for a Socio-Technical E-Learning Employability System of Measurement (STELEM)

“…In fact, the vast majority of countries have been applying lifelong learning initiatives that have been based and have been very close to the human capital theory [6,7], itself based on the importance of skills and abilities learned by citizens as avenues for the economic and social development of countries. In this way, many criticisms are being put on the table, one being that its conceptualization is too utopian [8]; other examples of criticisms involve its economic orientation and mercantilist vision of education [9].…”

The Impact of Education on Economic Growth in Jordan during (1960-2016)

“…Education of women at primary level stimulates economic growth indirectly by inducing lower fertility rate. Gilead (2012), examines from a philosophical perspective, the link between education and the currently prevailing understanding of economic progress, which is grounded in human capital theory, and investigate the foundations of human capital theory conception of economic progress. He argued that there are inherent tensions between the philosophical foundations of the economist's conception of progress and the very essence of education, and in order to resolve these tensions we should consider grounding the economic theory that guides educational policy-making in an inter subjective or objective conception of welfare.…”

Análisis crítico-filosófico de las potencialidades educativas de la enseñanza basada en competencias

“…Importantes organizaciones supranacionales, como la OCDE y el Banco Mundial, consideran la educación como la herramienta más valiosa de dicho crecimiento (Gilead, 2012). Esta visión es acorde a la mentada teoría del Capital Humano, desde la cual el EEES asignó nuevas misiones a la universidad del siglo XXI: "intervenir en los procesos de innovación del sistema productivo y de las relaciones de la vida social" (Medina, 2005).…”