2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3445824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from Time Use Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Education can affect pro-environmental action by positively impacting on labor market outcomes and earnings (Card 1999, Heckman et al 2006, Oreopoulos and Salvanes 2011, Cole et al 2014, improving the affordability of pro-environmental behavior and increasing individual willingness to pay for environmental quality (Hökby andSöderqvist 2003, Jacobsen andHanley 2009). On the other hand, by increasing earnings, education also raises the opportunity cost of time, plausibly disincentivizing time-consuming proenvironmental action (Akar et al 2019). By affecting time preferences and increasing patience (Becker and Mulligan 1997, Oreopoulos and Salvanes 2011, Perez-Arce 2017, Jung et al 2019, education can raise the value of distant benefits of pro-environmental behavior, while by impacting on generalized trust (Yang 2019), it contributes to improving the public's confidence in scientific evidence and the effectiveness of environmental policy (Volland 2017Tam and Chan 2018, Fairbrother et al 2019, Hao et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education can affect pro-environmental action by positively impacting on labor market outcomes and earnings (Card 1999, Heckman et al 2006, Oreopoulos and Salvanes 2011, Cole et al 2014, improving the affordability of pro-environmental behavior and increasing individual willingness to pay for environmental quality (Hökby andSöderqvist 2003, Jacobsen andHanley 2009). On the other hand, by increasing earnings, education also raises the opportunity cost of time, plausibly disincentivizing time-consuming proenvironmental action (Akar et al 2019). By affecting time preferences and increasing patience (Becker and Mulligan 1997, Oreopoulos and Salvanes 2011, Perez-Arce 2017, Jung et al 2019, education can raise the value of distant benefits of pro-environmental behavior, while by impacting on generalized trust (Yang 2019), it contributes to improving the public's confidence in scientific evidence and the effectiveness of environmental policy (Volland 2017Tam and Chan 2018, Fairbrother et al 2019, Hao et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past three decades, many countries put in place education reforms that increased higher education attainment rates (Bratti et al, 2008; Blanden and Machin (2004); Kyui (2016)). In Turkey, there have been two education reforms that increased both secondary and tertiary education levels, first that extended compulsory schooling from 5 to 8 years in 1997 (Akar et al 2019; Aydemir and Kirdar, 2017; Kirdar et al 2016) and second increased available slots in tertiary education by 60 per cent during 2006–2009 (Caner et al 2019), thereby increasing youth education levels. Hence, higher labour market expectations due to increased human capital investments may have resulted in wage and job quality expectations that exceed current job offers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%