Paths of Inequality in Brazil 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78184-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education and Inequality in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the countless variables associated with the study of social inequalities, income remains the most important [67,68]. Nevertheless, education has been listed as the variable with the greatest capacity to produce social mobility [69]. In the last decade, studies have also highlighted the close relationship between urban inequality and environmental variables.…”
Section: Latent and Observed Variables Of S-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the countless variables associated with the study of social inequalities, income remains the most important [67,68]. Nevertheless, education has been listed as the variable with the greatest capacity to produce social mobility [69]. In the last decade, studies have also highlighted the close relationship between urban inequality and environmental variables.…”
Section: Latent and Observed Variables Of S-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazil has experienced significant socioeconomic changes between 2003 and 2014,9 including decreasing unemployment rates and income inequality, and an increase in the gross domestic product (GDP) 10,11. Although the country was not severely impacted by the 2008-2009 global economic crisis, the GDP declined by 3.7% in 2015 and the unemployment rate increased for the first time in over a decade, rising from 6.8 to 8.5% 2,12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable evidence from Brazil that the linearity of the relationship between human capital stocks and employment may not hold. Drawing on dualistic theories, there is ample evidence linking race and gender to low income and low labour mobility, with the most affected groups including non-whites and women (Lovell, 2003, 2006; Arias et al ., 2004; Loureiro et al ., 2004; Ferreira and Veloso, 2006; Marió et al ., 2008; Menezes-Filho and Scorzafave, 2009; Saboia and Saboia, 2009; Arbache and Loureiro, 2012; Fontes et al ., 2012; Cacciamali and Tatei, 2013). Lower wages and higher rates of informality in the labour market both contribute to the disproportionate representation of non-whites among the poor with limited income and labour mobility (Arcand and D'Hombres, 2004; Arias et al ., 2004), with non-white Brazilians earning about half the wages of white Brazilians (Saboia and Saboia, 2009).…”
Section: The Empirical Evidence On Ccts: What We Know and What We Stimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the empirical evidence of returns to employment in Brazil also appears problematic in terms of the link between human capital, employment and poverty reduction in the CCT model. With the expansion of public education and CCTs, educational attainment among the Brazilian labour force has steadily increased, with a growing proportion of the workforce now having completed secondary school (see, for example, Arabsheibani et al ., 2006; Menezes-Filho and Scorzafave, 2009; Zepeda et al ., 2009; Manacorda et al ., 2010; Küpfer et al ., 2012). As a result, the relative wages of semi-skilled/secondary-educated workers have fallen compared with both unskilled/primary and high-skilled/tertiary-educated workers (Giovannetti and Menezes-Filho, 2006; Manacorda et al ., 2010).…”
Section: The Empirical Evidence On Ccts: What We Know and What We Stimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation