2020
DOI: 10.4114/intartif.vol23iss66pp124-137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Education 4.0 using artificial intelligence for students performance analysis

Abstract: Nowadays, predicting students' performance is one of the most specific topics for learning environments, such as universities and schools, since it leads to the development of effective mechanisms that can enhance academic outcomes and avoid destruction. In education 4.0, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can play a key role in identifying new factors in students' performance and implementing personalized learning, answering routine student questions, using learning analytics, and predictive modeling. It is a new c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the examples are presented in (Abdullah et al, 2021 ; Cerezo et al, 2017 ; Lu et al, 2018 ; Mansouri et al, 2021 ; Shayan & van Zaanen, 2019 ), authors used students’ behaviors logs containing their interactions with the online content to assess their performance, while Ayouni et al ( 2021 ) and Hussain et al ( 2018 ) used it to measure students’ levels of engagement. (Chen & Cui, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Dass et al, 2021 ; Macarini et al, 2019 ) utilized features related to time spent on online materials to identify at-risk of failing students or the ones who are most likely to dropout. However, other authors (Adnan et al, 2021 ; Goel & Goyal, 2020 ; Karalar et al, 2021 ; Waheed et al, 2020 ; Yu et al, 2019 ) utilized behavioral data compromised in students' clickstreams data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the examples are presented in (Abdullah et al, 2021 ; Cerezo et al, 2017 ; Lu et al, 2018 ; Mansouri et al, 2021 ; Shayan & van Zaanen, 2019 ), authors used students’ behaviors logs containing their interactions with the online content to assess their performance, while Ayouni et al ( 2021 ) and Hussain et al ( 2018 ) used it to measure students’ levels of engagement. (Chen & Cui, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Dass et al, 2021 ; Macarini et al, 2019 ) utilized features related to time spent on online materials to identify at-risk of failing students or the ones who are most likely to dropout. However, other authors (Adnan et al, 2021 ; Goel & Goyal, 2020 ; Karalar et al, 2021 ; Waheed et al, 2020 ; Yu et al, 2019 ) utilized behavioral data compromised in students' clickstreams data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Neha et al ( 2021 ) proposed a deep neural network for evaluating student performance assessments, meanwhile Ayouni et al ( 2021 ) used an ANN to predict students’ engagement in an online environment. In (Chen et al, 2020 ), researchers employed a hybridized deep neural network to identify students at risk early in the exams. (Chen & Cui, 2020 ; Dias et al, 2020 ; Mubarak et al, 2021 ) utilized the recurrent neural network named long short-term memory (LSTM) to predict course performance, evaluate the quality of interactions and students’ involvement, and predict students’ weekly performance, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a supporting application is needed to cover all the content needed, so that the effectiveness of learning on disaster mitigation material can be fulfilled. The Smart Teaching approach, utilizing technology and artificial intelligence, effectively enhances student engagement (Chen et al, 2020;Dimitriadou & Lanitis, 2023). By delivering interactive content through applications and online platforms, teachers create a compelling learning experience.…”
Section: Article Infomentioning
confidence: 99%