2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eDNA for detection of five highly invasive molluscs. A case study in urban rivers from the Iberian Peninsula

Abstract: Biological invasions are an important threat to biodiversity especially in aquatic ecosystems, and their frequency is generally higher near urban areas. Potentially invasive non-indigenous molluscs were deliberately introduced into European waters for food (Corbicula fluminea) and biocontrol (Melanoides tuberculata), and unintentionally introduced by ballast water (Mytilopsis leucophaeata, Corbicula fluminea), stock contamination (Sinanodonta woodiana), accidental escapes from aquaculture (Sinanodonta woodiana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis may be a gamechanger (Mahon & Jerde, 2016;Taberlet, Bonin, Zinger, & Coissac, 2018). Recently, eDNA methods have been developed to target some of the most harmful aquatic invaders such as in crayfish (Tréguier et al, 2014), molluscs (Clusa, Miralles, Basanta, Escot, & Garcia-Vazquez, 2017), mosquitoes (Schneider et al, 2016), fishes (Nevers et al, 2018), pathogenic fungi (Schmidt, Kéry, Ursenbacher, Hyman, & Collins, 2013), amphibians (Dejean et al, 2012), and plants (Gantz, Renshaw, Erickson, Lodge, & Egan, 2018). In parallel, the multispecies approach offered by eDNA metabarcoding may transform the monitoring of aquatic biodiversity (Deiner et al, 2017;Pont et al, 2018;Valentini et al, 2016), but its utility for the detection of emerging cryptic aliens faces several challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis may be a gamechanger (Mahon & Jerde, 2016;Taberlet, Bonin, Zinger, & Coissac, 2018). Recently, eDNA methods have been developed to target some of the most harmful aquatic invaders such as in crayfish (Tréguier et al, 2014), molluscs (Clusa, Miralles, Basanta, Escot, & Garcia-Vazquez, 2017), mosquitoes (Schneider et al, 2016), fishes (Nevers et al, 2018), pathogenic fungi (Schmidt, Kéry, Ursenbacher, Hyman, & Collins, 2013), amphibians (Dejean et al, 2012), and plants (Gantz, Renshaw, Erickson, Lodge, & Egan, 2018). In parallel, the multispecies approach offered by eDNA metabarcoding may transform the monitoring of aquatic biodiversity (Deiner et al, 2017;Pont et al, 2018;Valentini et al, 2016), but its utility for the detection of emerging cryptic aliens faces several challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of C. formosanus global spread are still subject to debate. Some authors pointed at the dissemination (deliberate or accidental) of its first intermediate host, Melanoides tuberculata, whereas others hold responsible the movements of birds and freshwater fish [16,17,19,21,25,27,28,30,[49][50][51]. In particular, given the huge numbers of the ornamental fish industry in Europe (approximately 300 million fish, more than 2500 species, of which 60% are of freshwater origin), the importation of ornamental freshwater fish, from countries where C. formosanus is endemic, plays a crucial role in spreading this parasite [35,36,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we look to the future, climate change will make mariculture possible in regions where it currently does not exist, potentially increasing the risk of exotic species introductions (Holmer, ). Fortunately, promising new approaches, such as the use of environmental DNA, are improving our detection and understanding of invasive impacts (Clusa, Miralles, Basanta, Escot, & García‐Vázquez, ).…”
Section: Ecological Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%