2001
DOI: 10.1525/var.2001.17.2.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edmund Carpenter: Explorations In Media & Anthropology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process, the (foreign and local) information gets repeated and modified, and this is a continuous process that moves information forward through various mediums that are bias to time or space. As Onufrijchuck says that "form lead to changes in content, and then changes in content lead to mutations of form" (quoted in Prins andBishop 2001-2002:115).…”
Section: According To Postmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the process, the (foreign and local) information gets repeated and modified, and this is a continuous process that moves information forward through various mediums that are bias to time or space. As Onufrijchuck says that "form lead to changes in content, and then changes in content lead to mutations of form" (quoted in Prins andBishop 2001-2002:115).…”
Section: According To Postmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As perspectives change, new questions emerge. Occasionally, historical revisionism restores some unique characters previously neglected (Prins andBishop 2001-2002: 110).…”
Section: According To Postmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back in Toronto, Carpenter partnered his close friend Marshall McLuhan in launching their now‐famous “culture and communication” project and frequently appeared on radio and television (Carpenter 2001b; Prins and Bishop 2002:114–117). Then, in 1955, he returned to Nunavut, making a long journey by dogsled across Melville Peninsula and Baffin Island with Iglulikmiut on either side of Fury and Hecla Strait.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… There is confusion when that film was made, as Carpenter informed the first author it had been shot in 1954 (see Prins and Bishop 2002, p.114), a date picked up by the French catalog under review (p.78). The English catalog, however, changed this date to 1957 (p. 82).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%