2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00233-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EDM constraints in supersymmetric theories

Abstract: We systematically analyze constraints on supersymmetric theories imposed by the experimental bounds on the electron, neutron, and mercury electric dipole moments. We critically reappraise the known mechanisms to suppress the EDMs and conclude that only the scenarios with approximate CP-symmetry or flavour-off-diagonal CP violation remain attractive after the addition of the mercury EDM constraint.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
254
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
254
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, certain two-loop contributions are then enhanced [342,343,344,345] which do not decouple when the sfermions are heavy. ‡ Within each of these scenarios there also are particularly strong constraints arising from the atomic EDMs such as the mercury EDM [347], which appear to rule out many of the "cancellation" models constructed so far [348,341,349]. However, there are unavoidable theoretical uncertainties involved in the determination of the hadronic EDMs and the atomic EDMs (see e.g.…”
Section: Cp Violation and Electric Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, certain two-loop contributions are then enhanced [342,343,344,345] which do not decouple when the sfermions are heavy. ‡ Within each of these scenarios there also are particularly strong constraints arising from the atomic EDMs such as the mercury EDM [347], which appear to rule out many of the "cancellation" models constructed so far [348,341,349]. However, there are unavoidable theoretical uncertainties involved in the determination of the hadronic EDMs and the atomic EDMs (see e.g.…”
Section: Cp Violation and Electric Dipole Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDM constraints on this phase vary in the literature depending on how the uncertainties inherent in the atomic and hadronic EDMs are implemented, as discussed in Section 5.2.2, resulting in various boundaries of the MSSM parameter space with sufficient electroweak baryogenesis. For example, using the MSSM EDM analysis of [348] (which yields the strongest bound on φ µ + φ Ma ≤ 10 −2 at the GUT scale for sparticle masses consistent with naturalness) leads to the conclusion [629,631] that the O(10 −1 ) phase required for baryogenesis is only possible in models with most superpartner masses above the TeV range. However, the EDM bounds on this phase presented in [349] are about an order of magnitude less stringent, which may alleviate the restrictions on the MSSM parameter space somewhat in the case of light superpartner masses.…”
Section: Valid Mssm Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass insertion (δ d LR ) 22 , which is severely constrained by the experimental limit on the mercury EDM [15]:…”
Section: Squark Mixing: Ll Versus Lr Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-observation of the EDMs imposes strong constraints on the SUSY phases, forcing them to be very small. This is the so-called SUSY CP problem and many solutions have been proposed to overcome it [4,5]. SCPV is an attractive approach to the SUSY CP problem, since all the couplings of the Lagrangian are real, due to the imposition of CP invariance at the Lagrangian level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%