2013
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Volume 14, Number 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geser (2012) emphasises OEPs as requiring distinction from the emphasis on content and tools reflected in the range of literature in the OER landscape, mirroring the distinction Freire (1970) made between systematic education and educational projects. This ‘dominat(ion) by a traditional understanding of education as well as relevant content and tools’ (Geser, 2012, p. 23) reinforces prescriptive content- and assessment-focussed learning design due to ‘national policies and statutory laws, particularly curriculum and qualification frameworks’ (McGreal, Kinuthia, Marshall, & McNamara, 2013, p. 34). In keeping with the required shift in power to engage the learners in taking responsibility for their own learning design, the use of resources in open practice would seem to be the evolution which would lead to more authentic learner participation and competence in emergent workforces via informal learning projects like BowerBird.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geser (2012) emphasises OEPs as requiring distinction from the emphasis on content and tools reflected in the range of literature in the OER landscape, mirroring the distinction Freire (1970) made between systematic education and educational projects. This ‘dominat(ion) by a traditional understanding of education as well as relevant content and tools’ (Geser, 2012, p. 23) reinforces prescriptive content- and assessment-focussed learning design due to ‘national policies and statutory laws, particularly curriculum and qualification frameworks’ (McGreal, Kinuthia, Marshall, & McNamara, 2013, p. 34). In keeping with the required shift in power to engage the learners in taking responsibility for their own learning design, the use of resources in open practice would seem to be the evolution which would lead to more authentic learner participation and competence in emergent workforces via informal learning projects like BowerBird.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UNESCO has a long history in OER, having coined the concept of OER in 2002, passed the 2012 Paris OER Declaration and co-hosted (with Slovenia) the 2017 OER Global Conference (Hodgkinson-Williams and Arinto, 2017). The purpose of the declaration was to encourage the developed countries to pledge to promote OER and the Open Licensing of Educational Resources (McGreal et al ., 2013). In 2019, all the state representatives at UNESCO made a significant stride toward adopting open education based on the 2019 UNESCO OER Recommendations.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this extent, an OER strategy team should be formed representing the key stakeholders identified in Table I. Initially, “Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice” (McGreal et al , 2013) can be used as a key resource which helps the strategy team to understand how OER are widening the international community of scholars, various approaches to releasing and opening content and pedagogical, institutional, personal and technical issues relating to OER mainstreaming. To establish the short-, medium- and long-term goals for OER within the institution, “Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education” (Commonwealth of Learning, 2011) provides recommendations for the institution, academic staff, student bodies, QA/accreditation bodies and academic recognition bodies.…”
Section: Oer Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%