1990
DOI: 10.1177/016235329001300302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: The Public and Professional Perception of the Emotional Status of Gifted Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Groups did not differ according to either parent or teacher report on a series of scales carefully designed to identify children with clinically meaningful behavior problems. In contrast, authorities often report that students in gifted programs are better adjusted than their regular classroom peers (Gallagher, 1990;Janos & Robinson, 1985). However, it should be noted that the finding of superior adjustment among gifted education students is by no means ubiquitous; and a number of studies have found no differences between gifted and regular education students (Cornell, 1984;Cornell & Grossberg, 1987;Gallucci, 1988; see review by Janos & Robinson, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Groups did not differ according to either parent or teacher report on a series of scales carefully designed to identify children with clinically meaningful behavior problems. In contrast, authorities often report that students in gifted programs are better adjusted than their regular classroom peers (Gallagher, 1990;Janos & Robinson, 1985). However, it should be noted that the finding of superior adjustment among gifted education students is by no means ubiquitous; and a number of studies have found no differences between gifted and regular education students (Cornell, 1984;Cornell & Grossberg, 1987;Gallucci, 1988; see review by Janos & Robinson, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gallucci (1988) found no differences between his sample of 90 high-IQ adolescents and published norms for the CBCL and TRF. Several authors (Cornell, 1984;Gallagher, 1990;Janos & Robinson, 1985) pointed out that many studies claiming an advantage for high-ability students failed to control for social class differences favoring the students identified as gifted. It is difficult to reach firm conclusions from the absence of significant findings since null results are inherently equivocal, but the accumulation of null results across studies does indicate that the reported superior adjustment of gifted program students is not as robust as is commonly believed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on gifted children has focused on comparing adjustment levels between nongifted children because there is a commonly held stereotype of the maladjusted gifted child (Gallagher, 1990;O'Connor, 2005). This enduring stereotype paints the gifted child as socially awkward, anxious, and arrogant.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, descriptive literature on characteristics of gifted children suggests that such children possess unique psychological traits -perfectionism, heightened sensitivity, strong sense of justice -that may affect their behavior in negative ways. Gallagher (1990) recently observed that little research exists to support the "current wisdom" regarding the emotional status of gifted children. He called for more definitive research evidence on several questions, including the impact of increased sensitivity and stress.…”
Section: Psychological Intensities In Gifted Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%