2016
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i2.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: New Approaches to Political Leadership

Abstract: This editorial introduces the special issue and considers what the articles tell us about new approaches to political leadership. The editorial explains how each article engages with the core puzzles of political leadership and brings together many diverse theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of political leadership, a vibrant area of study currently in the midst of an academic renaissance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Profound societal, political and institutional changes driven by rapid technological and economic transformation are pushing scholars and practitioners of public administration to address new, complex, urgent and often wicked challenges (Head and Alford ). Public leadership has been advocated as a key element in addressing these challenges, potentially discerning, shaping, nurturing and facilitating public value (Pedersen and Hartley ; 't Hart ; Bennister ). Emerging ideas about ‘polycentric’, ‘pluricentric’ or decentred governance, based on interdependence, negotiation and trust, have been welcome approaches in the field (see Bevir ; Sørensen and Torfing ) and contribute to the sense that it is timely to be examining the concepts of public value and of leadership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profound societal, political and institutional changes driven by rapid technological and economic transformation are pushing scholars and practitioners of public administration to address new, complex, urgent and often wicked challenges (Head and Alford ). Public leadership has been advocated as a key element in addressing these challenges, potentially discerning, shaping, nurturing and facilitating public value (Pedersen and Hartley ; 't Hart ; Bennister ). Emerging ideas about ‘polycentric’, ‘pluricentric’ or decentred governance, based on interdependence, negotiation and trust, have been welcome approaches in the field (see Bevir ; Sørensen and Torfing ) and contribute to the sense that it is timely to be examining the concepts of public value and of leadership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the constituent elements of good public leadership remain contested, there seems to be a broad consensus that the specific circumstances of different contexts are crucial (’t Hart , p. 16; Bennister , p. 1). Thus, public leadership is embedded within the classic dynamics of structure vs. agency and the challenges of creating effective change (’t Hart p. 16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, public leadership is embedded within the classic dynamics of structure vs. agency and the challenges of creating effective change (’t Hart p. 16). Indeed, Bennister (, p. 2) poses the fundamental question of whether leaders can ‘overcome organizational and situational constraints to influence outcomes’. In their studies of collaborative public management, O'Leary and Bingham (, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scholars emphasize the importance of leaders' background, motivations and behaviour, advocating a person-centric understanding of political leadership ('t Hart & Rhodes, 2014). Despite its unceasing popularity, this approach has been criticized for its inadequacy to account for the causal capacity of the complex institutional and societal context in which political leaders operate (Bennister, 2016;'t Hart & Rhodes, 2014). As a result, it has lost its dominance in leadership studies to the interactionist approach, which embeds an agent-structure way of thinking and promotes the understanding of political leadership as the 'product of the interaction between the leader and the environment within which the leader is operating' (Bennister, 2016, p. 1).…”
Section: Conceptualizing Local Political Leadership In Forced Migrants' Receptionmentioning
confidence: 99%