Editorial

Zhao, Yuxiang; Hu, Xiao; Wei, Kangning

doi:10.1108/ajim-03-2020-316

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Tencent, one of China's Internet giants, has launched the TANYUAN Project (https://tanyuan.qq.com/home) in recent years to digitize cultural heritage to help the VCC from different perspectives. Academic institutions can contribute to cultural heritage information practices by providing expertise and scientific research (Zhao et al, 2020), and many high-impact cultural heritage digitization projects have the support of academic institutions (Hu et al, 2018;Kumpulainen & Late, 2022;Liang et al, 2020;Price, 2016;Tedd, 2011). Finally, both traditional mass media and emerging social media are important channels to help publicize and promote information practices in the cultural heritage field (Sabharwal, 2021;Tedd, 2011).…”

Section: Core Actors Of Vccmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years, many large‐scale cultural heritage digitization projects have leveraged this virtual collaboration to carry out a range of impactful tasks (Davidson & Reid, 2022; Kumpulainen & Late, 2022; Owens, 2013). With the advancement of open science and the rise of the digital humanities, more and more institutions are attempting to mobilize the public to do work that was previously beyond the institution's capacity (Zhao et al, 2020). For example, the Australia Newspaper Digitization Project (ANDP), initiated by the National Library of Australia, is dedicated to improving the searchability of digitized newspaper items using crowdsourced corrections of the text generated by the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tools (Zhang et al, 2022).…”

Section: Core Genres Of Vccmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cultural heritage crowdsourcing emphasizes the engagement with the wisdom of the crowd for diverse tasks, such as data collection, rating and tagging, correction, transcription, sharing and reuse, analysis, and sensemaking in cultural heritage domains (Oomen & Aroyo, 2011; Zhao et al, 2020). Over the past 10 years, some large cultural heritage organizations have promoted this VCC model and have had a significant social impact.…”

Section: Dominant Models Of Value Co‐creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In particular, cultural heritage information practices focus on exploring collective and/or collaborative information activities from an institutional and community perspective as opposed to individual information behaviors in the context of cultural heritage (Oberbichler et al, 2022). In light of this, cultural heritage information practices call for public participation and community engagement to address the many challenges of cultural heritage by drawing on collective wisdom and strength (Zhao et al, 2020). Some classic models, such as cultural heritage crowdsourcing (Zhang et al, 2020), citizen science (Dawson et al, 2020), and participatory design (Given & Kuys, 2022), have been widely used in cultural heritage‐related information work.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Zhao,

Lian,

Zhang

et al. 2023

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value co‐creation as a research topic has been a critical proposition of interest to a wide range of disciplines. In recent years, the field of cultural heritage has also developed a range of information practices to promote different forms of value co‐creation. While the body of literature has begun to accumulate, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of conceptual foundations and how value co‐creation is implemented in cultural heritage information practices. This paper conducted a hermeneutic literature review to understand and conceptualize the core aspects of value co‐creation in various cultural heritage information works. In particular, this paper provides a research mapping of the genres of co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices, the actors, and the roles played by the stakeholders. Further, this review provides an overview of the dominant value co‐creation models in the cultural heritage field. It distills the drivers of value co‐creation and the core value consequences that arise from a process perspective. Finally, this paper puts forward a thematic, theoretical, and methodological agenda for future work based on these findings. The review contributes to the literature by proposing an integrated conceptual framework that summarizes the core elements of value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices. The framework also serves as a call for action, providing a general understanding of the conceptual foundation for future research.

show abstract