Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics

Haberland, Hartmut; Mey, Jacob L.

doi:10.1016/0378-2166(77)90019-4

Cited by 63 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…I will not go into an evaluation of the camps' and their followers' relative merits and demerits; suffice it to say that the present author univocally subscribes to the second point of view (for a Condensed Statement, see the 'Editorial' that served äs introduction to the first volume of the Journal of Pragmatics more than 10 years ago [Haberland and Mey 1977]). By contrast, SW's book is clearly a representative of the other side (I presume that the authors themselves would not object to being thus classified, but let me assure them that no offense is intended!).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Review article

1988

Semiotica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brought to you by | provisional account Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/26/15 6:50 AM L'objet tel qu'il est represente ä un moment de cette serie est l'objet immediat. La relation de determination va donc de l'objet dynamique vers le signe en passant par l'objet immediat.La determination entre le signe et l'interpretant est le pouvoir qu'exerce le signe sur Tinterpretant pour le determiner a etre dans la meme relation avec le meme objet (CP: 1.541) ou etre un signe plus developpe du meme objet dans le sens ou il en exhibe plus de caracteristiques. C'est dans ce sens qu'il faut comprendre Tactualite et la potentialite de l'interpretant. La theorie des signes doit en principe s'appliquer a tout ce qui est un signe, soit tout ce qui peut etre interprete par une emotion, une action ou une pensee (Shapiro 1983: 25). Comme dans le cas de la relation entre le signe et son objet, la relation enire le signe et l'interpretant est affectee d'une regression a l'infini. Ainsi pour Peirce, la signification d'un signe ne peut etre autre chose qu'une representation. Cette representation n'etant rien d'autre que le signe sans ses aspects non pertinents. Mais tous ces aspects ne pouvant etre elimines, ils ne peuvent etre completement transformes qu'en quelque chose de plus diaphane (NEM 4:310). En tant qu'interpretant, il a lui aussi un Brought to you by | provisional account Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/26/15 6:50 AM Aspects phonomenologiques des elements des trichotomies Emotionel Energetique Logique Trichotomies c Immediat Hypothetique Categorique Relatif les interpretants Dynamique Sympatique Percutant Habituel en eux-memes Final Gratifiant Pratique Pragmatistique Tableau l Brought to you by | provisional account Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/26/15 6:50 AM Brought to you by | provisional account Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/26/15 6:50 AM La troisieme classification contient les memes trichotomies que la seconde, sauf qu'on y ajoute les quatre trichotomies suivantes: SO d = Reference du signe a son objet dynamique. SI d = Relation du signe ä son interpretant dynamique. SI f = Relation du signe ä son interpretant final. SO d I f = Assurance des interpretants. La figure 4 montre la relation entre les diverses trichotomies et comment, en envisageant les cas authentiques et degeneres (par precision), Brought to you by | provisional account Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/26/15 6:50 AM

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Review article

1988

Semiotica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…O trabalho que você iniciaria nos anos 1970, especialmente com a publicação da introdução ao primeiro número do Journal of Pragmatics (Mey & Haberland 1977), seria bem diferente do estruturalismo em que você foi treinado. Você poderia descrever como surgiu essa mudança de rumo no seu trabalho?…”

Section: A Entrevistaunclassified

Pragmática, sociedade (e a alma), uma entrevista com Jacob Mey

Silva

2014

DELTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is also the area of human language that has least appealed to Linguistics, which has been more concerned with grammar (Haberland & Mey 1977). With grammar as the central focus, there may have been less reason to analyze the things that people actually say, for, as Newmeyer (2004) wrote, utterance material "is all but useless for providing insights into the grammar of any individual speaker" (p. 698).…”

Section: Pragmatics and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has long been claimed that Homo sapiens is the only species that has language, but only recently has it been recognized that humans also have an unusual pattern of growth and development. Social mammals have two stages of pre-adult development: infancy and juvenility. Humans have two additional prolonged and pronounced life history stages: childhood, an interval of four years extending between infancy and the juvenile period that follows, and adolescence, a stage of about eight years that stretches from juvenility to adulthood. We begin by reviewing the primary biological and linguistic changes occurring in each of the four pre-adult ontogenetic stages in human life history. Then we attempt to trace the evolution of childhood and juvenility in our hominin ancestors. We propose that several different forms of selection applied in infancy and childhood; and that, in adolescence, elaborated vocal behaviors played a role in courtship and intrasexual competition, enhancing fitness and ultimately integrating performative and pragmatic skills with linguistic knowledge in a broad faculty of language. A theoretical consequence of our proposal is that fossil evidence of the uniquely human stages may be used, with other findings, to date the emergence of language. If important aspects of language cannot appear until sexual maturity, as we propose, then a second consequence is that the development of language requires the whole of modern human ontogeny. Our life history model thus offers new ways of investigating, and thinking about, the evolution, development, and ultimately the nature of human language.

show abstract

Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics

Cited by 63 publications

References 0 publications

Review article

Review article

Pragmática, sociedade (e a alma), uma entrevista com Jacob Mey

Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About