2021
DOI: 10.14246/irspsd.9.1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in current practices, the stakeholders' input is also negligible in the site-level planning. This opaque process of allocating land for infrastructural facilities at site-level and poor planning strategies lead to various issues which hill regions are facing (Dai,Junliang, Gao,Xiaolu et al, 2010;Kapoor, N., Jain et al, 2019;Liu, Shiu et al, 2021;Ma, Shen et al, 2010;Shekhar, 2011). The conventional planning process which is currently used is not structured and there are no rules to assess the developed site plan for its impact on the ecologically sensitive hill regions (Das, 2017;Han and Lin, 2017;Long, Shen et al, 2011;Sandra and Freddy, 2021;Zanudin, Ngah et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in current practices, the stakeholders' input is also negligible in the site-level planning. This opaque process of allocating land for infrastructural facilities at site-level and poor planning strategies lead to various issues which hill regions are facing (Dai,Junliang, Gao,Xiaolu et al, 2010;Kapoor, N., Jain et al, 2019;Liu, Shiu et al, 2021;Ma, Shen et al, 2010;Shekhar, 2011). The conventional planning process which is currently used is not structured and there are no rules to assess the developed site plan for its impact on the ecologically sensitive hill regions (Das, 2017;Han and Lin, 2017;Long, Shen et al, 2011;Sandra and Freddy, 2021;Zanudin, Ngah et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%