2011
DOI: 10.1505/146554811798293962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EDITORIAL: Forests, biodiversity and food security

Abstract: Forests are a considerable source of biodiversity and, as such, are inextricably linked to people's food security, nutrition and health in a number of fundamental ways. While previous work has examined the links between forests and human health, much of the focus has been on the contributions of forest biodiversity to plant based pharmacopoeias, the correlations between forests and disease and more recently between forests and physiological well-being (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
93
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Wild foods from agricultural land make a larger contribution to the diet than wild foods obtained in the forest. Possible explanations for the limited use and contribution to nutrition of foods from the forest include: ecological requirements of the most commonly consumed wild foods; cultural preference for wild foods from agricultural land; limited access due to deforestation, the time needed to travel to the forest to obtain foods and, present and historical forest governance policies and practices (Arnold et al 2011;Woodcock 1995). Nevertheless, our data suggest that on days when foods from the forest are consumed, they contribute between 10% and 34% of the intake of various nutrients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wild foods from agricultural land make a larger contribution to the diet than wild foods obtained in the forest. Possible explanations for the limited use and contribution to nutrition of foods from the forest include: ecological requirements of the most commonly consumed wild foods; cultural preference for wild foods from agricultural land; limited access due to deforestation, the time needed to travel to the forest to obtain foods and, present and historical forest governance policies and practices (Arnold et al 2011;Woodcock 1995). Nevertheless, our data suggest that on days when foods from the forest are consumed, they contribute between 10% and 34% of the intake of various nutrients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many wild foods from the forest were birds and mammals (figure 3 and table 2), which, although consumed infrequently, can make important contributions to micronutrient intake, even in small quantities (Arnold et al 2011;Murphy and Allen 2003). Only 6.1% of individuals had consumed any type of wild animal or bird in the last week, compared with 67.8% of individuals who had consumed domestic meat or fowl in the last Food items which were obtained from the forest < 10% of the time are in boldface.…”
Section: Wild Foods From the Farm And Forest In The Local Food Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many forest foods such as bushmeat, fish, fruits, leafy vegetables, nuts and seeds tend to be high in micronutrients (Vinceti et al 2008;Arnold et al 2011). As a result, they may be important for the dietary quality of people living in proximity to forests (Blaney et al 2009;Golden et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Africa, rural people, particularly the most vulnerable, rely on forests for their livelihoods (Colfer et al 2006;Harris and Mohammed 2003;Hautdidier and Gautier 2005;Ros-Tonen and Wiersum 2003). In the context of low employment opportunities and difficulties in accessing land, many of the rural poor collect forest products for their own use Ros-Tonen and Wiersum 2003;Somorin 2010), or for additional income generation (Angelsen and Wunder 2003;Arnold et al 2011;Egoh et al 2012;Fisher et al 2010;Warner 2000;Yemiru et al 2010). The importance of forest resources in rural communities is particularly significant during food shortage periods (Fisher et al 2010;Pramova et al 2012b;Vinceti et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%