2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Educational technology and addictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neurobehaviorist rhetoric of tech addiction is no longer confined to popular science (Guitton 2020;Melo et al 2020). Aaron and Lipton (2018) have recently claimed that "students' attraction to device use is driven in much the same way an addict is driven to their drug of choice [ …] Students need their 'fix'" (p. 374).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurobehaviorist rhetoric of tech addiction is no longer confined to popular science (Guitton 2020;Melo et al 2020). Aaron and Lipton (2018) have recently claimed that "students' attraction to device use is driven in much the same way an addict is driven to their drug of choice [ …] Students need their 'fix'" (p. 374).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating how gamification in learning environments can affect physical, cognitive, emotional, and social well-being is present in many international studies (Melo C. et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive issue identified is related to the students' distraction, which may be due to the novelty of the approach (Ibanez et al, 2018), while the physiological discomfort included the dizzy effect of virtual trip (Cheng et al, 2020) or the arms and hand pain because of holding digital devices (Fidan et al, 2019). Thus, it is fundamental to reflect on these drawbacks in a perspective of digital well-being, balancing the opportunities offered by these new technologies for educational purposes with the downsides of their use (Melo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%