Editorial: CORR ® Will Change to Double-blind Peer Review—What Took Us So Long to Get There?

Leopold, Seth S.

doi:10.1007/s11999-016-5198-0

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As some have pointed out, an analogy can be drawn between peer review and a quote by Winston Churchill: "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried." 1,4 Like democracy, peer review is imperfect but the system is necessary. Our responsibility in the medical scientific community is to ensure a fair, transparent, and scientifically rigorous process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are many who find single-anonymous peer review inherently biased. 1,3,8 In 2016, a randomized study was published in JAMA examining the differences in single-vs double-anonymous peer review as it relates to author and institution prestige. A fabricated orthopedic manuscript with intentional errors received either single-anonymous (n[57) or doubleanonymous reviews (n[62).…”

Section: Double-anonymous Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, at least 1 peer-reviewed journal to date has cited this study as its impetus for transitioning to double-anonymous peer review. 1 As seen in the Table, in the field of urology, The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Urology are both double-anonymous peer-reviewed journals.…”

Section: Double-anonymous Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, there have been calls for double-anonymous peer review both historically and in modern times. 1,3 In October 2021, The Journal of Urology Ò announced a new approach in an effort to increase fairness: "open peer review." 4 While there is no exact definition of open peer review, it aims to increase transparency by: publishing peer reviews, revealing reviewers' identities, increasing reviewer diversity, and exploring areas for public review before and after publication.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Peer Review in Urology Journals: What Is the Best Peer Review Model?

Kaplan-Marans

Khurgin

2023

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Double-anonymous Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Double-anonymous Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Peer Review in Urology Journals: What Is the Best Peer Review Model?

Kaplan-Marans

Khurgin

2023

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…В ведущих зарубежных изданиях традиционно публикуются аналитические статьи, содержащие обзор результатов текущих исследований по различным направлениям нашей специальности [5][6][7][8], и обсуждаются способы улучшения контроля качества научной продукции [9][10][11]. однако в отечественной травматологии и ортопедии аналитических обзоров соответствующего профиля нам найти не удалось.…”

Section: таблица 3 сведения о характере и уровнях кандидатских и доктunclassified

Traumatology and Orthopedics Research Speciality in 2017: Dissertations Analysis

Решетов

Тихилов

Кочиш

et al. 2018

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors present a short analysis of autoabstracts of all theses in traumatology and orthopedics speciality (14.01.15), 10 doctoral and 59 candidate theses, that were defended at 11 dedicated dissertation boards starting mid of October 2016 until mid of October 2017 and underwent expert reviews during 2017 in expert council of the Higher certifying commission on surgical science.The absolute majority of 26 papers in traumatology (16 candidate and 5 doctoral theses) were dedicated to treatment of patients with different fractures and another 5 candidate theses examined issues of arthroscopic procedures in case of a trauma. 25 dissertations in orthopedics mainly reviewed aspects of large joints replacement (6 candidate and 3 doctoral these) and treatment of periprosthetic infection (4 candidate theses). Spine pathologies (5 candidate theses) and oncology orthopedics (2 candidate theses) prevailed among dissertation topics on paediatric orthopedics. The only doctoral thesis on paediatric orthopaedics was dedicated to clubfoot.In accordance with recommended criteria of clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research journal 40 (67,8%) candidate theses and 2 (20%) doctoral theses corresponded to evidence level III, 17 (28,8%) candidate and 8 (80%) doctoral theses were classified as evidence level IV and only 2 candidate theses (3,4%) formally corresponded to evidence level II.

show abstract