2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Commentary: Don't Pig Out When Selecting a Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Augmentation Graft! Xenografts Are Not the Way to Go

Abstract: Porcine xenograft dermal onlay augmentation of rotator cuff repair does not provide improved cuff integrity or provide better clinical outcomes. The retear rate was actually higher in repairs augmented with a porcine xenograft than the control group. Adverse events occurred in 60% of the xenograft patients compared with 40% of the controls. The use of liquid platelet-rich plasma had no discernible impact. A total of 85% of the observed failures with the suture-bridging double-row repair were at the medial cuff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Several recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of synthetic grafts or allografts using the augmentation or interposition technique, but not of xenografts. 1,2,13,16,20,24 The potential mechanism for this is that xenografts contain too much xenogeneic deoxyribonucleic acid residue to provoke a vigorous immunogenic response, leading to scar tissue formation at the repair site. 16,20 Single augmentation repair reportedly provides strong support and reduces retear rates but cannot prevent degeneration changes such as fatty infiltration, which is consistent with the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 Several recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of synthetic grafts or allografts using the augmentation or interposition technique, but not of xenografts. 1,2,13,16,20,24 The potential mechanism for this is that xenografts contain too much xenogeneic deoxyribonucleic acid residue to provoke a vigorous immunogenic response, leading to scar tissue formation at the repair site. 16,20 Single augmentation repair reportedly provides strong support and reduces retear rates but cannot prevent degeneration changes such as fatty infiltration, which is consistent with the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4,22,31 However, some poorer outcomes of patch augmentation repair have also been seen in clinical practice, especially regarding patches derived from xenografts. 1,2,13,16,20,24 A multicenter study comparing open rotator cuff repair with augmented repair with a small intestine submucosal patch found that both groups had similar functional scores at 1 year postoperatively, while the augmented group had higher failure rates than the nonaugmented group. 13 Several recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of synthetic grafts or allografts using the augmentation or interposition technique, but not of xenografts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Synthetic grafts can be categorized as degradable and non-degradable with superior strength, consistency, and durability ( Ono et al, 2016 ). The xenografts are porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix scaffolds and were popularized as a low-cost alternative to the human-derived allografts ( Barber, 2018 ; Flury et al, 2018 ; Kalina et al, 2019 ; Polacek, 2019 ; Ravenscroft et al, 2019 ). Today, the superiority of dermal xenografts is still debated because they are cheaper and easier to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the two RCTs identified in a previous review, one evaluated a patch derived from porcine small intestine that has since been removed from the market due to safety concerns. [7,8] It is unclear what the current practice is regarding patch use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%