2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Biosignal processing and computational methods to enhance sensory motor neuroprosthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of a tridirectional (user-decoder-robot) BCI control of multi-DOF control is a novel attempt toward its aim. The results obtained in this preliminary study demonstrate that the use of automated interfaces to solve redundancy of joint movement is indeed possible and the positive results encourage us to further dwell into developing a tridirectional adaptive system for rehabilitative and assistive systems [58], [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The development of a tridirectional (user-decoder-robot) BCI control of multi-DOF control is a novel attempt toward its aim. The results obtained in this preliminary study demonstrate that the use of automated interfaces to solve redundancy of joint movement is indeed possible and the positive results encourage us to further dwell into developing a tridirectional adaptive system for rehabilitative and assistive systems [58], [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Most closed-loop FES systems addressed in previous works were established between the electrical stimulus and joint angle since it is more convenient to measure and process the joint angle than joint torque or muscle force. However, in order to take the immediate effect of muscle activity induced by FES control into account, introducing biofeedback into closed-loops should be considered for further FES development (Bruns et al, 2013 ; Hayashibe et al, 2015 ), thus contributing to individualized modeling and control to manage different muscle responses from each different subject.…”
Section: Personalized Electrical Stimulation Through Evoked Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in people with SCI, the application of NMES accelerates the process of neuromuscular fatigue due to the influence of the increased proportion of type II fibers and impacts muscle response time . Different time patterns and the amplitude of the NMES pulse have been reported in the literature with the purpose of delaying the muscle fatigue process, aiming for better efficiency of NMES in hybrid neuroprostheses …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Different time patterns and the amplitude of the NMES pulse have been reported in the literature with the purpose of delaying the muscle fatigue process, aiming for better efficiency of NMES in hybrid neuroprostheses. 16,17 The time lag between the onset of the muscle electrical activation and force production is called the electrical mechanical delay (EMD). [18][19][20] Electrochemical (synaptic transmission, excitation-contraction coupling process) and mechanical (power transmission over the elastic components) events occur during EMD, essentially influenced by the types of muscle fiber 5,[21][22][23] and by the fatigue process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%