2019
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Adaptive Kinetic-Fluid Models for Plasma Simulations on Modern Computer Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AMR was based on magnitudes of space charge and electric field. A fixed number of nonlinear subiterations (10) were performed with the total number of time steps of 15 000. During the first 5000 steps, Δt was increased to 200 ns.…”
Section: Nonlinear Convergence and Time Steppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMR was based on magnitudes of space charge and electric field. A fixed number of nonlinear subiterations (10) were performed with the total number of time steps of 15 000. During the first 5000 steps, Δt was increased to 200 ns.…”
Section: Nonlinear Convergence and Time Steppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent demands for understanding and addressing the disparity of temporal, spatial, and energy scales in plasmas come from developing adaptive kinetic-fluid solvers [10]. Many plasma problems require space, time, and model adaptation for an efficient solution [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innocenti et al (2017) present an approach to space weather prediction that aims toward exascale computing capabilites, using particle-in-cell methods to resolve physics on kinetic scales everywhere in the magnetosphere. Other approaches that do not follow the framework approach of coupling models that implement different, domain-relevant physics (Baker et al, 2009;Tóth et al, 2005) include the Vlasiator hybrid-Vlasov model (von Alfthan et al, 2014), which evolves the ion distribution function while treating the electrons as a fluid, other kinetic-fluid modeling approaches (Kolobov & Deluzet, 2019;Roytershteyn & Delzanno, 2018), and particle-in-cell models (Yang et al, 2016). Due to computational expense-or more precisely, the availability of computational resources to researchers-these kinetic simulations are currently limited to either small domains (Peng et al, 2015) or to two spatial dimensions (Innocenti et al, 2017;Jarvinen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Computational Approaches Resources and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%