Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Adaptive Hot Cognition: How Emotion Drives Information Processing and Cognition Steers Affective Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second contribution of this frameworkconnected to the firstlies in proposing the interpretation of meaningful coincidences not only as the output of a number of information processing biasesas postulated, for example, by Diaconis and Mosteller (1989) and Johansen and Osman (2015), but also as inputs, through the elicited affect heuristic, for the occurrence of other cognitive errors that drive management decisions. Apart from adding relevant support to the co-evolutionary interpretation of cognitive errors driven by the affect heuristic (Abatecola et al, 2018), this advancement supports the view of the functioning of the human mind (Systems 1 and 2) as occurring through parallel processes, which may collaborate in forming choices (Evans, 2008;Luo and Yu, 2015;Kret and Bocanegra, 2016;Kirkebøen and Nordbye, 2017;Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith, 2018). Indeed, affective states and cognition are framed here as collaborative forces whose interplay leads to the shape of management decisionsas also assumed by the recent Affect-Cognitive Theory (ACT) of management decisions (Cristofaro, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second contribution of this frameworkconnected to the firstlies in proposing the interpretation of meaningful coincidences not only as the output of a number of information processing biasesas postulated, for example, by Diaconis and Mosteller (1989) and Johansen and Osman (2015), but also as inputs, through the elicited affect heuristic, for the occurrence of other cognitive errors that drive management decisions. Apart from adding relevant support to the co-evolutionary interpretation of cognitive errors driven by the affect heuristic (Abatecola et al, 2018), this advancement supports the view of the functioning of the human mind (Systems 1 and 2) as occurring through parallel processes, which may collaborate in forming choices (Evans, 2008;Luo and Yu, 2015;Kret and Bocanegra, 2016;Kirkebøen and Nordbye, 2017;Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith, 2018). Indeed, affective states and cognition are framed here as collaborative forces whose interplay leads to the shape of management decisionsas also assumed by the recent Affect-Cognitive Theory (ACT) of management decisions (Cristofaro, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…the parallel-competitive alternatives approach (Hodgkinson and Sadler-Smith, 2018). In particular, the latter advances that Systems 1 and 2 processes can, "under most circumstances" (Pacini and Epstein, 1999, p. 972), operate in parallelthe so-called "hot" cognition (Kret and Bocanegra, 2016). In this approach, fast reasoning and rational judgment do not operate in silos according to the proposed task, but may concur in forming choices (Evans, 2008).…”
Section: Unfolding Irrationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers (Martínez-Marti & Ruch, 2017;Keye & Pidgeon, 2013;Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004) have documented the role of positive affect and mindfulness in individually predicting resilience, there is a dearth of studies that attempt to investigate the indirect relationships between these variables. There is an emerging body of research, which alludes to the notion that emotion may play a significant role in cognitive processing (Kret & Bocanegra, 2016;Tyng et al, 2017). According to Dane (2011), cognitive processing is an integral aspect of mindfulness because being able to pay attention to the present moment requires the individual to process both internal and external stimuli.…”
Section: Literature Review Resilience Positive Affect and Mindfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot executive functions are used to solve problems with an affective or motivational component [ 212 ], in areas such as decision-making [ 213 ]. In contrast, cold executive functions can be distinguished from hot executive functions by the absence of an affect linked to the cognitive process.…”
Section: A Review Of Neuropsychological Functioning In Tsmentioning
confidence: 99%