Handbook of Eating and Drinking 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14504-0_123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edible Insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide insect meal as a cost-efficient and sustainable protein source, they should, ideally, be reared on economically viable feedstuffs, which are not suitable for human or animal consumption (70)(71)(72) . As such, there is considerable interest in growing them on by-products from the food industry (73,74) , which would allow a circular economy based on sustainable, waste revalorisation. Insects generally have a relatively high fat content (15-50 % DM) which may not be suitable as a feed ingredient for fish and may thus require a defatted process.…”
Section: Alternative Protein Sources For Animal Feed and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide insect meal as a cost-efficient and sustainable protein source, they should, ideally, be reared on economically viable feedstuffs, which are not suitable for human or animal consumption (70)(71)(72) . As such, there is considerable interest in growing them on by-products from the food industry (73,74) , which would allow a circular economy based on sustainable, waste revalorisation. Insects generally have a relatively high fat content (15-50 % DM) which may not be suitable as a feed ingredient for fish and may thus require a defatted process.…”
Section: Alternative Protein Sources For Animal Feed and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blattodea (e.g., cockroaches and termites, 5%), Odonata (e.g., dragonflies, 3%), Araneae (e.g., spiders, 1%), and others (2%) with a decreasing trend order (Mitsuhashi, 2016;Feng et al, 2018;Jongema, 2017;Van Huis, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, most used and consumed edible insect orders are Coleoptera (e.g., beetles, 31%), Lepidoptera (e.g., silkworms, 17–18%), Hymenoptera (e.g., ants, bees, and wasps, 14–15%), Orthoptera (e.g., grasshoppers, locusts, and crickets, 13%), Hemiptera (e.g., leafhoppers, planthoppers, and true bugs, 10–11%), Blattodea (e.g., cockroaches and termites, 5%), Odonata (e.g., dragonflies, 3%), Araneae (e.g., spiders, 1%), and others (2%) with a decreasing trend order (Mitsuhashi, 2016; Feng et al. , 2018; Jongema, 2017; Van Huis, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of nutritional profile of insects is influenced by stage of development, origin, and diet (Govorushko, 2019 ; Kouřimská & Adámková, 2016 ). Nutritional composition of insects is influenced by their diets which implies that phytophagous R. differens feeding on host plants in different agro‐ecological zones would display considerable variation (Mwangi et al, 2018 ; Tang et al, 2019 ; van Huis, 2020 ). Nutritional composition of R. differens is known to be influenced by their diets (Lehtovaara et al, 2017 ; Rutaro, Malinga, Lehtovaara, Opoke, et al, 2018 ; Rutaro, Malinga, Lehtovaara, Valtonen, et al, 2018 ; Rutaro, Malinga, Opoke, Lehtovaara, et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%