1999
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-999-1503-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EDI convection measurements at 5-6 R<sub>E</sub> in the post-midnight region

Abstract: Abstract. We present the ®rst triangulation measurements of electric ®elds with the electron drift instrument (EDI) on Equator-S. We show results from ®ve highdata-rate passes of the satellite through the nearmidnight equatorial region, at geocentric distances of approximately 5±6 R E , during geomagnetically quiet conditions. In a co-rotating frame of reference, the measured electric ®elds have magnitudes of a few tenths of mV/m, with the E Â B drift generally directed sunward but with large variations. Tempo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the role of particle source location on the model gaps is investigated. It may be concluded that despite the evidence of large amplitude and directional local fluctuations of electric fields in the inner magnetosphere (Quinn et al, 1999), the existence of a stationary average convection pattern is confirmed by this modeling. This fact directly follows from observations of ISGs and from a good agreement of observations with modeled gaps calculated in the frames of adiabatic theory for a stationary (average) convection pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the role of particle source location on the model gaps is investigated. It may be concluded that despite the evidence of large amplitude and directional local fluctuations of electric fields in the inner magnetosphere (Quinn et al, 1999), the existence of a stationary average convection pattern is confirmed by this modeling. This fact directly follows from observations of ISGs and from a good agreement of observations with modeled gaps calculated in the frames of adiabatic theory for a stationary (average) convection pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It should be stressed here that the very existence of stationary convection in quiet times is currently under debate. The existence of a stationary pattern of particle drift motion averaged from large fluctuations of observed electric field, is called into question (Quinn et al, 1999). The observations of ISG which are possible only in a long-term stationary convection can be used to test this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the electric field at large K p index increases as the distance from the Earth decreases so that the radial dependence is opposite to the usual ionospheric shielding of the magnetospheric electric field. Quinn et al (1999) reported fluctuating electric fields in the inner magnetosphere measured by the Electron Drift Instrument (EDI) on Equator-S. Matsui et al (2003) analyzed the electric field measured by EDI on Cluster. Various types of electric fields exist, such as those originating from solar-wind magnetosphere coupling, subauroral polarization stream (SAPS), and ionospheric dynamo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of this dependence are given in Quinn et al (1999) and Paschmann et al (1999). The accuracy with which one can determine the drift step through triangulation depends on several factors, including the knowledge of the beam firing direction and the relative magnitude and orientation of the gun-detector baseline b, projected into the B ⊥ plane, with respect to the drift step, d. In general, triangulation is most accurate when the baseline is comparable in magnitude to the drift step.…”
Section: Cluster Edi Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid convection variations in the vicinity of the plasma sheet boundary are certainly not unexpected, and often continue to varying degrees into the equatorial regions (e.g. Quinn et al, 1999). Second, due to the flow variability, the ground software that determines the drift step, and thus the flow velocities from all beams within the averaging interval cannot, in many cases, obtain a sharplydefined result.…”
Section: February 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%