2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jctb.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edges not in any monochromatic copy of a fixed graph

Abstract: For a sequence (H i

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramsey-Turán number with more than 2 colours. We remark that the multicolour Ramsey-Turán number for triangles is related to a version of Ramsey number studied by Liu, Pikhurko and Sharifzadeh [19]. They introduced r * (K a 1 , .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ramsey-Turán number with more than 2 colours. We remark that the multicolour Ramsey-Turán number for triangles is related to a version of Ramsey number studied by Liu, Pikhurko and Sharifzadeh [19]. They introduced r * (K a 1 , .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, Theorems 1.8 and 1.9 in [19] imply ̺(K 3 , K 3 , K 3 ) = 2 5 and ̺(K 3 , K 3 , K 3 , K 3 ) = 15 32 . In general Ramsey-Turán numbers for larger cliques are not determined by r * , for example ̺(K 3 , K 5 ) = 2 5 = 1 2 1 − 1 r * (K 3 ,K 5 ) = 3 8 and ̺(K 4 , K 4 ) = 11 28 = 1 2 1 − 1 r * (K 4 ,K 4 ) = 1 3 .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In 2017, Ma [14] confirmed their problem for an infinite family of bipartite graphs. Later, Liu et al [13] extended Ma's result to a larger family of bipartite graphs and proved an upper bound for all bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that f k (n, K 3 ) ≤ nim k (n, K 3 ). For sufficiently large n, since nim 2 (n, K 3 ) = t(n, 2) (proven in [107]) and nim 3 (n, K 3 ) = t(n, 5) (proven in [128]), we have f k (n, K 3 ) = t(n, g r k−1 (K 3 : K 3 ) − 1) for k ∈ {2, 3}. In the following, we may assume k ≥ 4.…”
Section: Note That We Have Grmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recall that the Gallai-Ramsey number g r k (K 3 : H) is the minimum integer n such that every k-edge-coloring of K n contains either a rainbow copy of K 3 or a monochromatic copy of H. As we have seen in the previous two chapters, it is far from trivial to determine exact values of Gallai-Ramsey numbers, even for a small graph H. There the lower bounds were obtained by showing specific k-edge-colorings of complete graphs that do not admit a rainbow copy of K 3 or a monochromatic copy of H. Instead of disallowing a rainbow copy of K 3 and a monochromatic copy of H, it is natural to consider the related problem of determining the maximum number of edges that are not contained in any rainbow copy of K 3 or monochromatic copy of H. The analogous problem for classical Ramsey numbers was considered in [107,128,133]; in these papers the authors studied the maximum number of edges not contained in any monochromatic copy of H over all k-edge-colorings of K n . For k ≥ 2, let f k (n, H) denote the maximum number of edges not contained in any rainbow triangle or monochromatic copy of H, over all k-edge-colorings of K n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%