2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2009.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge, vertex and mixed fault diameters

Abstract: Let ▫${mathcal{D}}^E_q(G)$▫ denote the maximum diameter among all subgraphs obtained by deleting ▫$q$▫ edges of ▫$G$▫. Let ▫${mathcal{D}}^V_p(G)$▫ denote the maximum diameter among all subgraphs obtained by deleting ▫$p$▫ vertices of ▫$G$▫. We prove that ▫${mathcal{D}}^E_a(G) leqslant {mathcal{D}}^V_a(G) + 1$▫ a for all meaningful ▫$a$▫. We also define mixed fault diameter ▫${mathcal{D}}^M_{(p,q)}(G)$▫, where ▫$p$▫ vertices and ▫$q$▫ edges are deleted at the same time. We prove that for ▫$0 < l leqslant a$▫, ▫… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For triangle-free graphs we improve these bounds to 3n−1 5 for k = 2 and to approximately 2 k+1 n for k ≥ 3. Our bounds on the k-edge-fault-diameter for k ≥ 3 strengthen the above-mentioned bounds (1) and (2) in the sense that they show that these bounds on the diameter of graphs with minimum degree δ still hold asymptotically after removal of up to δ − 1 edges, provided the graph is δ-edge-connected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For triangle-free graphs we improve these bounds to 3n−1 5 for k = 2 and to approximately 2 k+1 n for k ≥ 3. Our bounds on the k-edge-fault-diameter for k ≥ 3 strengthen the above-mentioned bounds (1) and (2) in the sense that they show that these bounds on the diameter of graphs with minimum degree δ still hold asymptotically after removal of up to δ − 1 edges, provided the graph is δ-edge-connected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Hence there are at least 2 (1,2) incidences between edges of S and vertices of V 1 (V 2 , V 3 ), which adds up to a total of 5 incidences of vertices in V and edges in S. But there are exactly 4 incidences of the two edges of S with vertices of V, a contradiction. Hence we have at most one 1-pair.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous work [6] on vertex, edge and mixed fault diameters of connected graphs the following theorem has been proved. Theorem 2.7.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If some nodes or links are faulty, information may not be transmitted by these nodes and links. Therefore graphs with low fault diameters with respect to vertex faults [1,18], edge faults [2], and mixed faults [3] yield interesting interconnection networks. In [19], an upper bound for (vertex) fault-diameter of graph product is given in terms of fault diameters of the base and the fibre.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%