2004
DOI: 10.1364/ao.43.001250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge effects with the Preston equation for a circular tool and workpiece

Abstract: In a polishing process the wear is greater at the edge when the tool extends beyond the border of the workpiece. To explain this effect, we propose a new model in which the pressure is higher at the edge. This model is applied to the case of a circular tool that polishes a circular workpiece. Our model correctly predicts that a greater amount of material is removed from the edge of the workpiece.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is linear pressure distribution, the second is the skin model pressure distribution [8] [9]. Shown in Fig.4, at the actual processing, the pressure at the edge of workpiece is more than the other place.…”
Section: The Average Pressure Between the Lap And Workpiecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is linear pressure distribution, the second is the skin model pressure distribution [8] [9]. Shown in Fig.4, at the actual processing, the pressure at the edge of workpiece is more than the other place.…”
Section: The Average Pressure Between the Lap And Workpiecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the ring TIFs for the different lap location e; the ω is equal to 1. The edge effect is introduced by using the skin-pressure model when the lap overhangs at the edge of the mirror [21]. The skin-pressure model divided the lap-workpiece contact region into two regions, lower pressure region B and higher pressure region C, when the lap overhangs at the mirror edge.…”
Section: Mathematical Model For Calculating Ring Tifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. A. Jones suggested a linear pressure distribution model in 1986 [7]. Luna-Aguilar, et al (2004) developed this approach further using a non-linear high pressure distribution near the edge of the part; however, they did not report the models validity by experimental results [8].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%