2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge effects on the realised soil seed bank along microclimatic gradients in temperate European forests

Abstract: Seed bank responses to different microclimates were studied in temperate forests.• Thermophilous forests showed a compositionally different edge vs interior seed bank. • Forest edges shifted the seedling community to a more light-demanding composition.• Soil translocation from up to lowland favoured the emergence of generalist plants.• Forest fragmentation should be prevented to conserve seed banks' forest specialists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions favour the development of plant communities dominated by species that also occur outside forests, across a wide range of environmental gradients, defined as generalists (Marinšek et al, 2015). By contrast, the shady, humid and more stable microclimate of forest interiors prevents or limits their success (Gasperini et al, 2021; Normann et al, 2016) and is usually more suitable for shade‐tolerant species, referred to as forest specialists (Marinšek et al, 2015). Forest edges are also characterized by a higher seed influx of non‐forest species (Devlaeminck et al, 2005), and higher nitrogen deposition and carbon stocks (Remy et al, 2016), compared to forest interiors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such conditions favour the development of plant communities dominated by species that also occur outside forests, across a wide range of environmental gradients, defined as generalists (Marinšek et al, 2015). By contrast, the shady, humid and more stable microclimate of forest interiors prevents or limits their success (Gasperini et al, 2021; Normann et al, 2016) and is usually more suitable for shade‐tolerant species, referred to as forest specialists (Marinšek et al, 2015). Forest edges are also characterized by a higher seed influx of non‐forest species (Devlaeminck et al, 2005), and higher nitrogen deposition and carbon stocks (Remy et al, 2016), compared to forest interiors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directional changes in community composition can be summarized also via species' thermal niches into a floristic temperature index, which is a community weighted mean of species' temperature preferences (Vangansbeke et al, 2021). Changes in the relative abundance of warm adapted versus cool adapted species can be used as an indicator of the impacts of local temperature change on communities (Zellweger et al, 2020), and can also be applied to reveal cooler temperature preferences of seed bank communities in the interior than in the edge (Gasperini et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current list was made publicly available on figshare in 2019 (Heinken et al, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8095217.v1), and has since been applied in several scientific publications, e.g., to assess the variation in plant species diversity and composition along edge‐to‐interior gradients in forests across Europe (Govaert et al, 2020), to study the migration of forest herbs along hedgerow corridors (Vanneste et al, 2020), to assess functional diversity of understorey plant communities in fragmented landscapes (Vanneste et al, 2019), to experimentally assess the effects of both macro‐ and microclimatic changes on understorey plants with contrasting degree of forest affinity (De Pauw et al, 2021), to model their population growth rates under a changing climate system (Sanczuk et al, 2021), and to characterize the seed bank in forests along various environmental gradients (Gasperini et al, 2021). Other potential applications of this list are: To study the effects of global environmental change (climate change, land‐use change, atmospheric pollution, biological invasions, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Figure 4 for the reason of merging the categories 2.2 and O. Moreover, species classified as O necessarily have a 2.2 habitat preference in at least one region, otherwise they would not be part of this forest species list e.g., to assess the variation in plant species diversity and composition along edge-to-interior gradients in forests across Europe (Govaert et al, 2020), to study the migration of forest herbs along hedgerow corridors (Vanneste et al, 2020), to assess functional diversity of understorey plant communities in fragmented landscapes (Vanneste et al, 2019), to experimentally assess the effects of both macro-and microclimatic changes on understorey plants with contrasting degree of forest affinity (De Pauw et al, 2021), to model their population growth rates under a changing climate system (Sanczuk et al, 2021), and to characterize the seed bank in forests along various environmental gradients (Gasperini et al, 2021). Other potential applications of this list are:…”
Section: Expected Impact Limitations and Ways Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%